What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Flying low 10-15 ft above the water, over Oakridge lake when it rolled and struck trees. Destroyed. Other circumsta (.4)the first pilot (commercial pilot and CFI) invited the second pilot (private pilot) to fly with him on a personal flight in a tandem-seated aerobatic airplane. The first pilot sat in the rear seat behind the second pilot. During the flight, the airplane was observed to fly about 10 feet above a lake. The airplane was then observed to begin a climb over a dam and perform a barrel roll about 100 feet above the dam. During the maneuver, the airplane descended into tall trees that were located on a hillside near the lower, dry section of the dam. The engine was operating under power at the time of impact. An examination of the wreckage and the engine did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions. An investigation revealed that the first pilot had a recent history of performing low altitude aerobatic maneuvers. He also had a recent history of performing the maneuvers himself when he took passengers or other pilots with him. No evidence was found was found in the autopsies to indicate that anyone other than the first pilot was manipulating the controls at impact.
As the FAA filed it
FLYING LOW 10-15 FT ABOVE THE WATER, OVER OAKRIDGE LAKE WHEN IT ROLLED AND STRUCK TREES. DESTROYED. OTHER CIRCUMSTA (.4)THE FIRST PILOT (COMMERCIAL PILOT AND CFI) INVITED THE SECOND PILOT (PRIVATE PILOT) TO FLY WITH HIM ON A PERSONAL FLIGHT IN A TANDEM-SEATED AEROBATIC AIRPLANE. THE FIRST PILOT SAT IN THE REAR SEAT BEHIND THE SECOND PILOT. DURING THE FLIGHT, THE AIRPLANE WAS OBSERVED TO FLY ABOUT 10 FEET ABOVE A LAKE. THE AIRPLANE WAS THEN OBSERVED TO BEGIN A CLIMB OVER A DAM AND PERFORM A BARREL ROLL ABOUT 100 FEET ABOVE THE DAM. DURING THE MANEUVER, THE AIRPLANE DESCENDED INTO TALL TREES THAT WERE LOCATED ON A HILLSIDE NEAR THE LOWER, DRY SECTION OF THE DAM. THE ENGINE WAS OPERATING UNDER POWER AT THE TIME OF IMPACT. AN EXAMINATION OF THE WRECKAGE AND THE ENGINE DID NOT REVEAL ANY PREIMPACT MECHANICAL MALFUNCTIONS. AN INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE FIRST PILOT HAD A RECENT HISTORY OF PERFORMING LOW ALTITUDE AEROBATIC MANEUVERS. HE ALSO HAD A RECENT HISTORY OF PERFORMING THE MANEUVERS HIMSELF WHEN HE TOOK PASSENGERS OR OTHER PILOTS WITH HIM. NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND WAS FOUND IN THE AUTOPSIES TO INDICATE THAT ANYONE OTHER THAN THE FIRST PILOT WAS MANIPULATING THE CONTROLS AT IMPACT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N8509 · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.