19980117000419A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Amtrqc CHALLENGER2 · Evergreen, AL · January 17, 1998

Date
January 17, 1998 · 15:00 local
Place
Evergreen, AL
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N132BC
NTSB investigation
NTSBATL98LA031
Reported as
Amtrqc CHALLENGER2
Reported engine
ROTAX ROTAX503
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
260 total46 in this make and model20 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The pilot reported that, while cruising at 1200 feet and about thirty minutes into the flight, the engine began to speed. When the pilot reduced the throttle, he noticed that the propeller assembly had seperated from the engine. The pilot selected an emergency landing area on the nearby interstate highway. The right wing of the airplane collided with an overpass bridge as the pilot attempted to fly under the bridge during the forced landing. An examination of the airframe, at the accident site, confirmed that the propeller assembly had seperated from the engine assembly. During the examination of the airframe, it was also noted that six propeller retention bolts were not present with the engine. The propeller assembly and the six propeller retention bolts were not recovered for examination. According to the pilot, he assembled the airplane in accordance with the kit instruction. The propeller assembly was installed on the engine and secured with six 5/16 inch coarse threaded bolts provided. (-23) while in cruise flight the propeller separated from N132BC, the right wing and nose gear were substantially damaged. Inspection of the propeller attachment assembly revealed that non-aviation hardware was used, and not required for this type of aircraft.

As the FAA filed it

THE PILOT REPORTED THAT, WHILE CRUISING AT 1200 FEET AND ABOUT THIRTY MINUTES INTO THE FLIGHT, THE ENGINE BEGAN TO SPEED. WHEN THE PILOT REDUCED THE THROTTLE, HE NOTICED THAT THE PROPELLER ASSEMBLY HAD SEPERATED FROM THE ENGINE. THE PILOT SELECTED AN EMERGENCY LANDING AREA ON THE NEARBY INTERSTATE HIGHWAY. THE RIGHT WING OF THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH AN OVERPASS BRIDGE AS THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO FLY UNDER THE BRIDGE DURING THE FORCED LANDING. AN EXAMINATION OF THE AIRFRAME, AT THE ACCIDENT SITE, CONFIRMED THAT THE PROPELLER ASSEMBLY HAD SEPERATED FROM THE ENGINE ASSEMBLY. DURING THE EXAMINATION OF THE AIRFRAME, IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT SIX PROPELLER RETENTION BOLTS WERE NOT PRESENT WITH THE ENGINE. THE PROPELLER ASSEMBLY AND THE SIX PROPELLER RETENTION BOLTS WERE NOT RECOVERED FOR EXAMINATION. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, HE ASSEMBLED THE AIRPLANE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KIT INSTRUCTION. THE PROPELLER ASSEMBLY WAS INSTALLED ON THE ENGINE AND SECURED WITH SIX 5/16 INCH COARSE THREADED BOLTS PROVIDED. (-23) WHILE IN CRUISE FLIGHT THE PROPELLER SEPARATED FROM N132BC, THE RIGHT WING AND NOSE GEAR WERE SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. INSPECTION OF THE PROPELLER ATTACHMENT ASSEMBLY REVEALED THAT NON-AVIATION HARDWARE WAS USED, AND NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS TYPE OF AIRCRAFT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.