19980404005471A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Cessna 172N · Marieita, GA · April 4, 1998

Date
April 4, 1998 · 10:32 local
Place
Marieita, GA
Phase of flight
Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Collision
Midair collision, first aircraft
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N737WD
NTSB investigation
NTSBATL98FA060
Reported as
Cessna 172N
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
1

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Passing thru atl area VFR no transponder nor on ATC ffc. Collided with citation N111LR on climbout. Both crashed.(.4) a Cessna 525 and a Cessna 172 collided in flight about 3,400 feet mean sea level on converging courses, with the 525 heading north and the 172 heading southwest. The converging speed was about 300 knots. The 525 departed under instrument flight rules, received vectors, and was initiating a climb on course. Training in the 525 emphasizes maximum use of the autopilot to afford greater outside scanning by the single pilot. The 525 was in radio contact with terminal approach control and the pilot's acknowledgement of the climb clearance was interrupted by the collision. The 172 had departed a local airfield, located just outside the 30 mile mode c veil airspace of a terminal airport, and proceeded southwest. The collision occurred as the 172 was approaching class d airspace of a military tower, and the pilot was initiating radio contact with the military tower. The terminal approach controller in contact with the 525 stated he did not observe the primary target of the 172, and conflict alert software was not installed. The 172 did not display a transponder signal and the transponder switch was subsequently found in the `off' position. A cockpit visibility study indicated that from a fixed eye position the 172 was essentially hidden behind aircraft structure of the 525 for the 125 seconds before impact. The 172 could be seen by shifting the pilot's eye position. The 525 was viewable in the left lower section of the 172'S windscreen. Both airplanes were operating in visual flight conditions.

As the FAA filed it

PASSING THRU ATL AREA VFR NO TRANSPONDER NOR ON ATC FFC. COLLIDED WITH CITATION N111LR ON CLIMBOUT. BOTH CRASHED.(.4) A CESSNA 525 AND A CESSNA 172 COLLIDED IN FLIGHT ABOUT 3,400 FEET MEAN SEA LEVEL ON CONVERGING COURSES, WITH THE 525 HEADING NORTH AND THE 172 HEADING SOUTHWEST. THE CONVERGING SPEED WAS ABOUT 300 KNOTS. THE 525 DEPARTED UNDER INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES, RECEIVED VECTORS, AND WAS INITIATING A CLIMB ON COURSE. TRAINING IN THE 525 EMPHASIZES MAXIMUM USE OF THE AUTOPILOT TO AFFORD GREATER OUTSIDE SCANNING BY THE SINGLE PILOT. THE 525 WAS IN RADIO CONTACT WITH TERMINAL APPROACH CONTROL AND THE PILOT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE CLIMB CLEARANCE WAS INTERRUPTED BY THE COLLISION. THE 172 HAD DEPARTED A LOCAL AIRFIELD, LOCATED JUST OUTSIDE THE 30 MILE MODE C VEIL AIRSPACE OF A TERMINAL AIRPORT, AND PROCEEDED SOUTHWEST. THE COLLISION OCCURRED AS THE 172 WAS APPROACHING CLASS D AIRSPACE OF A MILITARY TOWER, AND THE PILOT WAS INITIATING RADIO CONTACT WITH THE MILITARY TOWER. THE TERMINAL APPROACH CONTROLLER IN CONTACT WITH THE 525 STATED HE DID NOT OBSERVE THE PRIMARY TARGET OF THE 172, AND CONFLICT ALERT SOFTWARE WAS NOT INSTALLED. THE 172 DID NOT DISPLAY A TRANSPONDER SIGNAL AND THE TRANSPONDER SWITCH WAS SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND IN THE `OFF' POSITION. A COCKPIT VISIBILITY STUDY INDICATED THAT FROM A FIXED EYE POSITION THE 172 WAS ESSENTIALLY HIDDEN BEHIND AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE OF THE 525 FOR THE 125 SECONDS BEFORE IMPACT. THE 172 COULD BE SEEN BY SHIFTING THE PILOT'S EYE POSITION. THE 525 WAS VIEWABLE IN THE LEFT LOWER SECTION OF THE 172'S WINDSCREEN. BOTH AIRPLANES WERE OPERATING IN VISUAL FLIGHT CONDITIONS.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.