What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23)Pilot stated that while entering the Malone airport traffic area he lost power to one or both engines. The pilot was unable to maintain control and crashed approximately 1/2 mile east of the airport. (.4)after a 4.7 hour flight, while turning onto final, the airplane landed short. The pilot did not mention engine problems during a police interview. He subsequently told an FAA inspector that the left engine failed, then later, that the right engine failed. He told the safety board that both engines failed. Adequate fuel was confirmed. The previous day, the right engine failed approaching another airport. The pilot performed a single-engine go-around, with landing gear and flaps down. He refused assistance and performed his own maintenance. He cleaned the fuel filters of both engines. During a ground runup, the right engine was hard to start, and required a high fuel flow to remain running. After the pilot re-cleaned the right fuel filter the engine ran fine. The flight was uneventful until the accident. Post-flight examination revealed all propeller blades bent back 90 degrees, with significant chordwise scoring on one blade per engine. The left engine fuel filter was relatively clean, with some brown residue which contained ferrour material. The right engine fuel filter was heavily coated with a white residue which contained aluminum, and brown material which contained ferrous material. The pilot received his multi-engine rating on April 22, 1998.
As the FAA filed it
(-23)PILOT STATED THAT WHILE ENTERING THE MALONE AIRPORT TRAFFIC AREA HE LOST POWER TO ONE OR BOTH ENGINES. THE PILOT WAS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL AND CRASHED APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE EAST OF THE AIRPORT. (.4)AFTER A 4.7 HOUR FLIGHT, WHILE TURNING ONTO FINAL, THE AIRPLANE LANDED SHORT. THE PILOT DID NOT MENTION ENGINE PROBLEMS DURING A POLICE INTERVIEW. HE SUBSEQUENTLY TOLD AN FAA INSPECTOR THAT THE LEFT ENGINE FAILED, THEN LATER, THAT THE RIGHT ENGINE FAILED. HE TOLD THE SAFETY BOARD THAT BOTH ENGINES FAILED. ADEQUATE FUEL WAS CONFIRMED. THE PREVIOUS DAY, THE RIGHT ENGINE FAILED APPROACHING ANOTHER AIRPORT. THE PILOT PERFORMED A SINGLE-ENGINE GO-AROUND, WITH LANDING GEAR AND FLAPS DOWN. HE REFUSED ASSISTANCE AND PERFORMED HIS OWN MAINTENANCE. HE CLEANED THE FUEL FILTERS OF BOTH ENGINES. DURING A GROUND RUNUP, THE RIGHT ENGINE WAS HARD TO START, AND REQUIRED A HIGH FUEL FLOW TO REMAIN RUNNING. AFTER THE PILOT RE-CLEANED THE RIGHT FUEL FILTER THE ENGINE RAN FINE. THE FLIGHT WAS UNEVENTFUL UNTIL THE ACCIDENT. POST-FLIGHT EXAMINATION REVEALED ALL PROPELLER BLADES BENT BACK 90 DEGREES, WITH SIGNIFICANT CHORDWISE SCORING ON ONE BLADE PER ENGINE. THE LEFT ENGINE FUEL FILTER WAS RELATIVELY CLEAN, WITH SOME BROWN RESIDUE WHICH CONTAINED FERROUR MATERIAL. THE RIGHT ENGINE FUEL FILTER WAS HEAVILY COATED WITH A WHITE RESIDUE WHICH CONTAINED ALUMINUM, AND BROWN MATERIAL WHICH CONTAINED FERROUS MATERIAL. THE PILOT RECEIVED HIS MULTI-ENGINE RATING ON APRIL 22, 1998.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.