19980607012399A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Mooney M20A · Canyon Creek, MT · June 7, 1998

Date
June 7, 1998 · 09:45 local
Place
Canyon Creek, MT
Phase of flight
Descent
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N1048B
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA98FA089
Reported as
Mooney M20A
Reported engine
Lycoming O360A1A
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
1
Pilot’s flight hours
153 total1 in this make and model33 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Broke up in flight when VFR pilot tried operate in IMC. Indicates sprial dive and sudden pullup. (.4)prior to takeoff, the pilot received a weather briefing for his proposed route of flight. The specialist reported low ceilings and mountain obscuration along the route, and suggested a route of flight away from the mountains and poor weather conditions. The pilot filed a visual flight rules flight plan for his original route. Approaching his destination, the pilot contacted air traffic and advised that he needed assistance in locating an airport that was clear of the weather, as he was on top of an overcast layer and could not see the ground. The controller informed the pilot of the multiple cloud layers in the area and to remain in visual conditions. With the aid of other pilots in the area who were reporting actual weather conditions, the controller was maneuvering the aircraft to an area where he might be able to get below the overcast layer. While en route, the pilot notified the controller that he saw a hole and was going to try and punch through it. Shortly after this time, the aircraft dropped off radar contact and t here was no further communication from the pilot. Evidence found at the accidnet site indicated that the aircraft broke-up in flight. The low-time, non-instrument rated pilot had just purchased the airplane and had not received the cmoplex aircrat sign-ff for solo operation. (-23) aircraft appears to have broken up while in flight when the non-instrument rated pilot attempted to operate visually in IMC.

As the FAA filed it

BROKE UP IN FLIGHT WHEN VFR PILOT TRIED OPERATE IN IMC. INDICATES SPRIAL DIVE AND SUDDEN PULLUP. (.4)PRIOR TO TAKEOFF, THE PILOT RECEIVED A WEATHER BRIEFING FOR HIS PROPOSED ROUTE OF FLIGHT. THE SPECIALIST REPORTED LOW CEILINGS AND MOUNTAIN OBSCURATION ALONG THE ROUTE, AND SUGGESTED A ROUTE OF FLIGHT AWAY FROM THE MOUNTAINS AND POOR WEATHER CONDITIONS. THE PILOT FILED A VISUAL FLIGHT RULES FLIGHT PLAN FOR HIS ORIGINAL ROUTE. APPROACHING HIS DESTINATION, THE PILOT CONTACTED AIR TRAFFIC AND ADVISED THAT HE NEEDED ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING AN AIRPORT THAT WAS CLEAR OF THE WEATHER, AS HE WAS ON TOP OF AN OVERCAST LAYER AND COULD NOT SEE THE GROUND. THE CONTROLLER INFORMED THE PILOT OF THE MULTIPLE CLOUD LAYERS IN THE AREA AND TO REMAIN IN VISUAL CONDITIONS. WITH THE AID OF OTHER PILOTS IN THE AREA WHO WERE REPORTING ACTUAL WEATHER CONDITIONS, THE CONTROLLER WAS MANEUVERING THE AIRCRAFT TO AN AREA WHERE HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET BELOW THE OVERCAST LAYER. WHILE EN ROUTE, THE PILOT NOTIFIED THE CONTROLLER THAT HE SAW A HOLE AND WAS GOING TO TRY AND PUNCH THROUGH IT. SHORTLY AFTER THIS TIME, THE AIRCRAFT DROPPED OFF RADAR CONTACT AND T HERE WAS NO FURTHER COMMUNICATION FROM THE PILOT. EVIDENCE FOUND AT THE ACCIDNET SITE INDICATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT BROKE-UP IN FLIGHT. THE LOW-TIME, NON-INSTRUMENT RATED PILOT HAD JUST PURCHASED THE AIRPLANE AND HAD NOT RECEIVED THE CMOPLEX AIRCRAT SIGN-FF FOR SOLO OPERATION. (-23) AIRCRAFT APPEARS TO HAVE BROKEN UP WHILE IN FLIGHT WHEN THE NON-INSTRUMENT RATED PILOT ATTEMPTED TO OPERATE VISUALLY IN IMC.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.