What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Broke up in flight when VFR pilot tried operate in IMC. Indicates sprial dive and sudden pullup. (.4)prior to takeoff, the pilot received a weather briefing for his proposed route of flight. The specialist reported low ceilings and mountain obscuration along the route, and suggested a route of flight away from the mountains and poor weather conditions. The pilot filed a visual flight rules flight plan for his original route. Approaching his destination, the pilot contacted air traffic and advised that he needed assistance in locating an airport that was clear of the weather, as he was on top of an overcast layer and could not see the ground. The controller informed the pilot of the multiple cloud layers in the area and to remain in visual conditions. With the aid of other pilots in the area who were reporting actual weather conditions, the controller was maneuvering the aircraft to an area where he might be able to get below the overcast layer. While en route, the pilot notified the controller that he saw a hole and was going to try and punch through it. Shortly after this time, the aircraft dropped off radar contact and t here was no further communication from the pilot. Evidence found at the accidnet site indicated that the aircraft broke-up in flight. The low-time, non-instrument rated pilot had just purchased the airplane and had not received the cmoplex aircrat sign-ff for solo operation. (-23) aircraft appears to have broken up while in flight when the non-instrument rated pilot attempted to operate visually in IMC.
As the FAA filed it
BROKE UP IN FLIGHT WHEN VFR PILOT TRIED OPERATE IN IMC. INDICATES SPRIAL DIVE AND SUDDEN PULLUP. (.4)PRIOR TO TAKEOFF, THE PILOT RECEIVED A WEATHER BRIEFING FOR HIS PROPOSED ROUTE OF FLIGHT. THE SPECIALIST REPORTED LOW CEILINGS AND MOUNTAIN OBSCURATION ALONG THE ROUTE, AND SUGGESTED A ROUTE OF FLIGHT AWAY FROM THE MOUNTAINS AND POOR WEATHER CONDITIONS. THE PILOT FILED A VISUAL FLIGHT RULES FLIGHT PLAN FOR HIS ORIGINAL ROUTE. APPROACHING HIS DESTINATION, THE PILOT CONTACTED AIR TRAFFIC AND ADVISED THAT HE NEEDED ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING AN AIRPORT THAT WAS CLEAR OF THE WEATHER, AS HE WAS ON TOP OF AN OVERCAST LAYER AND COULD NOT SEE THE GROUND. THE CONTROLLER INFORMED THE PILOT OF THE MULTIPLE CLOUD LAYERS IN THE AREA AND TO REMAIN IN VISUAL CONDITIONS. WITH THE AID OF OTHER PILOTS IN THE AREA WHO WERE REPORTING ACTUAL WEATHER CONDITIONS, THE CONTROLLER WAS MANEUVERING THE AIRCRAFT TO AN AREA WHERE HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET BELOW THE OVERCAST LAYER. WHILE EN ROUTE, THE PILOT NOTIFIED THE CONTROLLER THAT HE SAW A HOLE AND WAS GOING TO TRY AND PUNCH THROUGH IT. SHORTLY AFTER THIS TIME, THE AIRCRAFT DROPPED OFF RADAR CONTACT AND T HERE WAS NO FURTHER COMMUNICATION FROM THE PILOT. EVIDENCE FOUND AT THE ACCIDNET SITE INDICATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT BROKE-UP IN FLIGHT. THE LOW-TIME, NON-INSTRUMENT RATED PILOT HAD JUST PURCHASED THE AIRPLANE AND HAD NOT RECEIVED THE CMOPLEX AIRCRAT SIGN-FF FOR SOLO OPERATION. (-23) AIRCRAFT APPEARS TO HAVE BROKEN UP WHILE IN FLIGHT WHEN THE NON-INSTRUMENT RATED PILOT ATTEMPTED TO OPERATE VISUALLY IN IMC.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.