19980617025119A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Boeing 737-322 · Denver, CO · June 17, 1998

Date
June 17, 1998 · 20:46 local
Place
Denver, CO
Airport
Denver International
Phase of flight
Other Ground Ops
Operating rules
Air carrier (Part 121)
Operator
UALA
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N364UA
NTSB investigation
NTSBFTW98FA273
Reported as
Boeing 737322
Reported engine
CFMINT CFM563C1
People aboard
69
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
10,466 total3,783 in this make and model

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.4)The catering truck driver parked directly behind the airplane, awaiting the arrival of another flight at an adjacent gate. He set the parking brake, turned off the engine, but left the headlights on. He said he was not concerned about parking behind the airplane because the jetway was still in position, the airplane's rotating beacon was not flashing, and another catering truck was servicing the coach section. The other truck then moved around to the front of the airplane to service the first class section. After baggage had been loaded in the forward cargo bin, the belt loader was backed away from the airplane. Normally, the belt loader would then be positioned on the vehicle service road to warn traffic that an airplane was being pushed back. This was not possible because the belt loader was blocked by the catering truck that had backed away from the airplane. The tug operator had made a previous walk-around inspection of the airplane and observed no hazards. He said that prior to pushback, he looked under the airplane one more time and saw no obstacles. He said he did not see the parked catering truck. As the catering truck was backing away from the airplane, pushb ack began and the airplane collided with the parked catering truck.

As the FAA filed it

(.4)THE CATERING TRUCK DRIVER PARKED DIRECTLY BEHIND THE AIRPLANE, AWAITING THE ARRIVAL OF ANOTHER FLIGHT AT AN ADJACENT GATE. HE SET THE PARKING BRAKE, TURNED OFF THE ENGINE, BUT LEFT THE HEADLIGHTS ON. HE SAID HE WAS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT PARKING BEHIND THE AIRPLANE BECAUSE THE JETWAY WAS STILL IN POSITION, THE AIRPLANE'S ROTATING BEACON WAS NOT FLASHING, AND ANOTHER CATERING TRUCK WAS SERVICING THE COACH SECTION. THE OTHER TRUCK THEN MOVED AROUND TO THE FRONT OF THE AIRPLANE TO SERVICE THE FIRST CLASS SECTION. AFTER BAGGAGE HAD BEEN LOADED IN THE FORWARD CARGO BIN, THE BELT LOADER WAS BACKED AWAY FROM THE AIRPLANE. NORMALLY, THE BELT LOADER WOULD THEN BE POSITIONED ON THE VEHICLE SERVICE ROAD TO WARN TRAFFIC THAT AN AIRPLANE WAS BEING PUSHED BACK. THIS WAS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE THE BELT LOADER WAS BLOCKED BY THE CATERING TRUCK THAT HAD BACKED AWAY FROM THE AIRPLANE. THE TUG OPERATOR HAD MADE A PREVIOUS WALK-AROUND INSPECTION OF THE AIRPLANE AND OBSERVED NO HAZARDS. HE SAID THAT PRIOR TO PUSHBACK, HE LOOKED UNDER THE AIRPLANE ONE MORE TIME AND SAW NO OBSTACLES. HE SAID HE DID NOT SEE THE PARKED CATERING TRUCK. AS THE CATERING TRUCK WAS BACKING AWAY FROM THE AIRPLANE, PUSHB ACK BEGAN AND THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH THE PARKED CATERING TRUCK.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N364UA · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.