19980621014429A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Amtr BD-5 · Corvallis, OR · June 21, 1998

Date
June 21, 1998 · 15:30 local
Place
Corvallis, OR
Airport
Corvallis Municipal
Phase of flight
Fcd/Prec Ldg From Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N50TX
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA98FA109
Reported as
Amtr BD5
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
775 total2 in this make and model19 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Engine quit shallow left turn. Unable restart. Landed in tall grass field. A wing caught on grass. Flipped over. (-23) according to the pilot, he was in a shallow banked left turn when the engine suddenly quit. He tried several times to restart the engine, but was not successful. He therefore elected to make a forced landing in a nearby field in which tall grass was growing. The aircraft touched own in an upright position, but one wing caught in the tall grass and the aircraft flipped upside down. (.4) during the assembly of the home-built aircraft, its wet-wing fuel tanks were sloshed with a sealer (randolph #802) that is not compatible with alcohol fuel additives. During the aircraft's three week engine test run and test flight sequence, jet-a fuel containing an ethanol fuel additive (prist) was in its fuel tanks. This resulted in the sloshing compound debonding from the fuel tank walls and partially blocking an in-line fuel filter. Because of this blockage, approximately 25 minutes into the fourth test flight, the aircraft experienced a total loss of power. During the subsequent forced landing, the aircraft nosed over when one of its wings became entangled in tall vegetation . During the investigation it was determined that the owner/builder, the test pilot, representatives of the company that helped mate the engine to the airframe, and the supplier of the engine/propeller/gearbox assembly, all of whom were present for the ground run and test flight sequence on that day, were not aware that an alcohol fuel additive may be present in some jet-a fuel at the time of purchase.

As the FAA filed it

ENGINE QUIT SHALLOW LEFT TURN. UNABLE RESTART. LANDED IN TALL GRASS FIELD. A WING CAUGHT ON GRASS. FLIPPED OVER. (-23) ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, HE WAS IN A SHALLOW BANKED LEFT TURN WHEN THE ENGINE SUDDENLY QUIT. HE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TO RESTART THE ENGINE, BUT WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. HE THEREFORE ELECTED TO MAKE A FORCED LANDING IN A NEARBY FIELD IN WHICH TALL GRASS WAS GROWING. THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED OWN IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION, BUT ONE WING CAUGHT IN THE TALL GRASS AND THE AIRCRAFT FLIPPED UPSIDE DOWN. (.4) DURING THE ASSEMBLY OF THE HOME-BUILT AIRCRAFT, ITS WET-WING FUEL TANKS WERE SLOSHED WITH A SEALER (RANDOLPH #802) THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH ALCOHOL FUEL ADDITIVES. DURING THE AIRCRAFT'S THREE WEEK ENGINE TEST RUN AND TEST FLIGHT SEQUENCE, JET-A FUEL CONTAINING AN ETHANOL FUEL ADDITIVE (PRIST) WAS IN ITS FUEL TANKS. THIS RESULTED IN THE SLOSHING COMPOUND DEBONDING FROM THE FUEL TANK WALLS AND PARTIALLY BLOCKING AN IN-LINE FUEL FILTER. BECAUSE OF THIS BLOCKAGE, APPROXIMATELY 25 MINUTES INTO THE FOURTH TEST FLIGHT, THE AIRCRAFT EXPERIENCED A TOTAL LOSS OF POWER. DURING THE SUBSEQUENT FORCED LANDING, THE AIRCRAFT NOSED OVER WHEN ONE OF ITS WINGS BECAME ENTANGLED IN TALL VEGETATION . DURING THE INVESTIGATION IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE OWNER/BUILDER, THE TEST PILOT, REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMPANY THAT HELPED MATE THE ENGINE TO THE AIRFRAME, AND THE SUPPLIER OF THE ENGINE/PROPELLER/GEARBOX ASSEMBLY, ALL OF WHOM WERE PRESENT FOR THE GROUND RUN AND TEST FLIGHT SEQUENCE ON THAT DAY, WERE NOT AWARE THAT AN ALCOHOL FUEL ADDITIVE MAY BE PRESENT IN SOME JET-A FUEL AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N50TX · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.