19980702015719A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-28-140 · Tulsa, OK · July 2, 1998

Date
July 2, 1998 · 00:20 local
Place
Tulsa, OK
Airport
Downtown Airpark Airport
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N1656J
NTSB investigation
NTSBFTW98LA294
Reported as
Piper PA28140
Reported engine
Lycoming O320E2A
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
1,000 total300 in this make and model65 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The flight was scheduled to review flight maneuvers prior to the studen's practical flight test for the private pilot certificate. The airplane was configured with 25 degrees of flaps for a simulated short field takeoff. The flight instructor added that 'the engine sounded smooth during the entire flight' and the airplane appeared to accelerate normally as it became airborne by 2,000 foot runway marker. After breaking ground, the 66 hour student pilot extiblished the airplane at the best angle of climb speed; however, the airplane's climb performance was degraded to the point that the airplane was only climbing at a rate of 100 fpm. The flight instructor assumed the controls and initially managed to maneuver the airplane around rising terrain and obsgtructions at the departure end of the runway. The engine was examined under the supervision of the FAA inspector. The engine was started andoperated through the normal flight parameters. No pre-existing engine deficiencies were noted and the investigation did not reveal any evidence that the engine was not capable of operating and producing power prior to the accident. (-23) following takeoff out of Tulsa Downtown airpark, the aircraft was unable to climb above terrain due to low performance from engine. The instructor took over the controls and made a forced landing in a field one mile south of the airpark.

As the FAA filed it

THE FLIGHT WAS SCHEDULED TO REVIEW FLIGHT MANEUVERS PRIOR TO THE STUDEN'S PRACTICAL FLIGHT TEST FOR THE PRIVATE PILOT CERTIFICATE. THE AIRPLANE WAS CONFIGURED WITH 25 DEGREES OF FLAPS FOR A SIMULATED SHORT FIELD TAKEOFF. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ADDED THAT 'THE ENGINE SOUNDED SMOOTH DURING THE ENTIRE FLIGHT' AND THE AIRPLANE APPEARED TO ACCELERATE NORMALLY AS IT BECAME AIRBORNE BY 2,000 FOOT RUNWAY MARKER. AFTER BREAKING GROUND, THE 66 HOUR STUDENT PILOT EXTIBLISHED THE AIRPLANE AT THE BEST ANGLE OF CLIMB SPEED; HOWEVER, THE AIRPLANE'S CLIMB PERFORMANCE WAS DEGRADED TO THE POINT THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS ONLY CLIMBING AT A RATE OF 100 FPM.THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ASSUMED THE CONTROLS AND INITIALLY MANAGED TO MANEUVER THE AIRPLANE AROUND RISING TERRAIN AND OBSGTRUCTIONS AT THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY. THE ENGINE WAS EXAMINED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE FAA INSPECTOR. THE ENGINE WAS STARTED ANDOPERATED THROUGH THE NORMAL FLIGHT PARAMETERS. NO PRE-EXISTING ENGINE DEFICIENCIES WERE NOTED AND THE INVESTIGATION DID NOT REVEAL ANY EVIDENCE THAT THE ENGINE WAS NOT CAPABLE OF OPERATING AND PRODUCING POWER PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. (-23) FOLLOWING TAKEOFF OUT OF TULSA DOWNTOWN AIRPARK, THE AIRCRAFT WAS UNABLE TO CLIMB ABOVE TERRAIN DUE TO LOW PERFORMANCE FROM ENGINE. THE INSTRUCTOR TOOK OVER THE CONTROLS AND MADE A FORCED LANDING IN A FIELD ONE MILE SOUTH OF THE AIRPARK.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N1656J · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.