19980916037909A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 152 · Ellington, CT · September 16, 1998

Date
September 16, 1998 · 20:40 local
Place
Ellington, CT
Airport
Ellington Airport
Phase of flight
Fcd/Prec Ldg From Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N307DW
NTSB investigation
NTSBNYC98LA188
Reported as
Cessna 152
Reported engine
Lycoming O235L2C
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
5,113 total52 in this make and model54 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.19)On September 16, 1998, about 2040 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 152, N307DW, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Ellington, Connecticut. The certificated flight instructor and student pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the dual instruction flight that originated from nashua, new hampshire, about 1940. No flight plan had been filed for the flight that was conducted under 14 CFR part 91. According to an inspector from the federal aviation administration (FAA), the dual cross-country flight was destined for an intermediate stop at the bradley international airport (bdl), windsor locks, Connecticut, and to terminate at keene, new hampshire. As the flight neared bdl, the pilots received VFR traffic advisories from bradley approcah control. The FAA inspector further said the pilot reported a power loss, and requested radar vectors to the nearest airport. He was instructed that Ellington Airport was the closest, and received vectors to the airport. The pilot was then able to restart the engine and requested to continue to bdl. A few minutes after the engine restart, the engine lost power a second time. When advised of the power loss, the controller instructed the pilot that skylark airport was closest; however, the pilot requested to go to Ellington. The pilot then experienced difficulty in visually acquiring the airport. Following visual acquisition of ellinton airport, the pilot reported that he was unable to reach the airport and set up for an off airport landing. The landing was performed in an open field with a soft surface. After touchdown, the wheels dug in and the airplane nosed over. Both occupants exited the airplane unaided. The airplane was examined by an FAA inspector who reported both fuel tanks were empty. There was no evidence of fuel siphoning, or fuel spill from under the fuel caps. About 1/4 of a cup of fuel was drained from the main sump. The fuel tanks were wet, but only contained a few ounces of fuel. All fuel recovered was bright and clear, and without visible contamination. Documents recovered from the airplane revealed the flight between nashua and bdl was planned to take about 1 hour, and the pilot had planned for 2 hours of fuel onboard at departure. According to the FAA airport facility directory, Ellington Airport did not have a rotating beacon. The runw ay lights were low intensity, and were placarded as non-standard, due to spacing and color variation. The runway at Ellington Airport was orientated 1/19, and was 1,800 feet long. The airplane was approaching Ellington Airport from the southwest, at an approximate 45 degree angle to the runway. According to FAA records, the flight instructor had in excess of 2,000 flight hours. (From .4) the student pilot and instructor planned on a night cross-country flight of 1 hour duration. The student pilot reported there was 2 hours of fuel onboard and the flight instructor accepted his word. The engine lost power as they neared their destination. The pilot picked an airport with non-standard, low intensity runway lights, and no rotating beacon for an emergency landing. When they finally acquired the field visually, there was insufficient altitude to reach it. The airplane landed in an open field with soft terrain and flipped over. Post accident interviews disclosed the student pilot had performed the pre-flight inspection. In addition, he was not familiar with the use of a device to measure the quantity of fuel in the tanks. (-23) on September 16, 1998 at approx. 2040 local time, a Cessna 152 N307DW, owned by daniel webster college, crashed in a marshy grassy field in Ellington, CT, while on a flight from nashua, n.h. (ash) to windsor locks, CT. (Bdl). Visible flight rule condiitons prevailed at the time and a flight plan was filed with bangor flight service. The aircraft was destroyed and the instructor and student pilot were uninjured. The flight originated at nashua, n.h. (ash), on September 16, 1998 at approx. 1950 hrs. Local time.

As the FAA filed it

(.19)ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1998, ABOUT 2040 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A CESSNA 152, N307DW, WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED DURING A FORCED LANDING NEAR ELLINGTON, CONNECTICUT. THE CERTIFICATED FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT PILOT WERE NOT INJURED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED FOR THE DUAL INSTRUCTION FLIGHT THAT ORIGINATED FROM NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, ABOUT 1940. NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED FOR THE FLIGHT THAT WAS CONDUCTED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91. ACCORDING TO AN INSPECTOR FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), THE DUAL CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT WAS DESTINED FOR AN INTERMEDIATE STOP AT THE BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BDL), WINDSOR LOCKS, CONNECTICUT, AND TO TERMINATE AT KEENE, NEW HAMPSHIRE. AS THE FLIGHT NEARED BDL, THE PILOTS RECEIVED VFR TRAFFIC ADVISORIES FROM BRADLEY APPROCAH CONTROL. THE FAA INSPECTOR FURTHER SAID THE PILOT REPORTED A POWER LOSS, AND REQUESTED RADAR VECTORS TO THE NEAREST AIRPORT. HE WAS INSTRUCTED THAT ELLINGTON AIRPORT WAS THE CLOSEST, AND RECEIVED VECTORS TO THE AIRPORT. THE PILOT WAS THEN ABLE TO RESTART THE ENGINE AND REQUESTED TO CONTINUE TO BDL. A FEW MINUTES AFTER THE ENGINE RESTART, THE ENGINE LOST POWER A SECOND TIME. WHEN ADVISED OF THE POWER LOSS, THE CONTROLLER INSTRUCTED THE PILOT THAT SKYLARK AIRPORT WAS CLOSEST; HOWEVER, THE PILOT REQUESTED TO GO TO ELLINGTON. THE PILOT THEN EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY IN VISUALLY ACQUIRING THE AIRPORT. FOLLOWING VISUAL ACQUISITION OF ELLINTON AIRPORT, THE PILOT REPORTED THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO REACH THE AIRPORT AND SET UP FOR AN OFF AIRPORT LANDING. THE LANDING WAS PERFORMED IN AN OPEN FIELD WITH A SOFT SURFACE. AFTER TOUCHDOWN, THE WHEELS DUG IN AND THE AIRPLANE NOSED OVER. BOTH OCCUPANTS EXITED THE AIRPLANE UNAIDED. THE AIRPLANE WAS EXAMINED BY AN FAA INSPECTOR WHO REPORTED BOTH FUEL TANKS WERE EMPTY. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF FUEL SIPHONING, OR FUEL SPILL FROM UNDER THE FUEL CAPS. ABOUT 1/4 OF A CUP OF FUEL WAS DRAINED FROM THE MAIN SUMP. THE FUEL TANKS WERE WET, BUT ONLY CONTAINED A FEW OUNCES OF FUEL. ALL FUEL RECOVERED WAS BRIGHT AND CLEAR, AND WITHOUT VISIBLE CONTAMINATION. DOCUMENTS RECOVERED FROM THE AIRPLANE REVEALED THE FLIGHT BETWEEN NASHUA AND BDL WAS PLANNED TO TAKE ABOUT 1 HOUR, AND THE PILOT HAD PLANNED FOR 2 HOURS OF FUEL ONBOARD AT DEPARTURE. ACCORDING TO THE FAA AIRPORT FACILITY DIRECTORY, ELLINGTON AIRPORT DID NOT HAVE A ROTATING BEACON. THE RUNW AY LIGHTS WERE LOW INTENSITY, AND WERE PLACARDED AS NON-STANDARD, DUE TO SPACING AND COLOR VARIATION. THE RUNWAY AT ELLINGTON AIRPORT WAS ORIENTATED 1/19, AND WAS 1,800 FEET LONG. THE AIRPLANE WAS APPROACHING ELLINGTON AIRPORT FROM THE SOUTHWEST, AT AN APPROXIMATE 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO THE RUNWAY. ACCORDING TO FAA RECORDS, THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR HAD IN EXCESS OF 2,000 FLIGHT HOURS. (FROM .4) THE STUDENT PILOT AND INSTRUCTOR PLANNED ON A NIGHT CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT OF 1 HOUR DURATION. THE STUDENT PILOT REPORTED THERE WAS 2 HOURS OF FUEL ONBOARD AND THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ACCEPTED HIS WORD. THE ENGINE LOST POWER AS THEY NEARED THEIR DESTINATION. THE PILOT PICKED AN AIRPORT WITH NON-STANDARD, LOW INTENSITY RUNWAY LIGHTS, AND NO ROTATING BEACON FOR AN EMERGENCY LANDING. WHEN THEY FINALLY ACQUIRED THE FIELD VISUALLY, THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT ALTITUDE TO REACH IT. THE AIRPLANE LANDED IN AN OPEN FIELD WITH SOFT TERRAIN AND FLIPPED OVER. POST ACCIDENT INTERVIEWS DISCLOSED THE STUDENT PILOT HAD PERFORMED THE PRE-FLIGHT INSPECTION. IN ADDITION, HE WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE USE OF A DEVICE TO MEASURE THE QUANTITY OF FUEL IN THE TANKS. (-23) ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 AT APPROX. 2040 LOCAL TIME, A CESSNA 152 N307DW, OWNED BY DANIEL WEBSTER COLLEGE, CRASHED IN A MARSHY GRASSY FIELD IN ELLINGTON, CT, WHILE ON A FLIGHT FROM NASHUA, N.H. (ASH) TO WINDSOR LOCKS, CT. (BDL). VISIBLE FLIGHT RULE CONDIITONS PREVAILED AT THE TIME AND A FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED WITH BANGOR FLIGHT SERVICE. THE AIRCRAFT WAS DESTROYED AND THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT PILOT WERE UNINJURED. THE FLIGHT ORIGINATED AT NASHUA, N.H. (ASH), ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 AT APPROX. 1950 HRS. LOCAL TIME.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.