19990619022019A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper J3C-65 · Elko, NV · June 19, 1999

Date
June 19, 1999 · 14:00 local
Place
Elko, NV
Airport
Elko Regional Airport
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N26842
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX99LA222
Reported as
Piper J3C65
Reported engine
Continental A658
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
5,360 total10 in this make and model

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On June 19, 1999, at 1346 hours pacific daylight time, a Piper J3C-65, N26842, impacted terrain after takeoff from the Elko, Nevada, airport. The aircraft, operated under 14 CFR part 91, sustained substantial damage. The commercial pilot/owner, the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions existed for the local area personal flight and no flight plan was filed. In an interview with a federal aviation administration (FAA) aviation safety technician, the pilot stated that the aircraft had recently gone through an annual inspection. He reported that on this flight he had conducted an engine run-up with no discrepancies noted. The pilot stated that the takeoff roll was normal; however, on the initial climb he noted a loss of power and a decay in airspeed. He stated that he thought there was something wrong with the engine. The pilot noted that he "had run out of runway," and would not be able to land straight ahead. He stated that he turned back to the runway, and as he was making the crosswind turn to the downwind leg, the left wing dipped down and the aircraft fell 50 feet to the ground. (.4)this was the first flight after an annual inspection had been performed. Prior to the initial takeoff, the airplane was taxi tested with no discrepancies noted. The pilot stated that the engine started easily and ran smoothly at lower RPM settings. An engine run-up was conducted, which included a magneto check, with no anomalies experienced. During the takeoff roll, the pilot noted that the engine did not produce full power. He elected to continue the takeoff, and noted that the RPM did not go above 1,600. He attempted to turn back to the runway to land. As he made the crosswind to downwind turn, the left wing stalled. The airplane pitched down and fell about 50 feet to the ground. The engine was inspected, and found to have weak compression in two cylinders. The examination further revealed that there were leaks coming from the intake and exhaust valves of both cylinders. No further discrepancies were noted. (-23)pilot initiated takeoff roll and never developed full power. Pilot elected to continue takeoff and lost further power after airborne. Pilot attempted to return to the runway, stalled the aircraft, and crashed.

As the FAA filed it

ON JUNE 19, 1999, AT 1346 HOURS PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME, A PIPER J3C-65, N26842, IMPACTED TERRAIN AFTER TAKEOFF FROM THE ELKO, NEVADA, AIRPORT. THE AIRCRAFT, OPERATED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT/OWNER, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS EXISTED FOR THE LOCAL AREA PERSONAL FLIGHT AND NO FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED. IN AN INTERVIEW WITH A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AVIATION SAFETY TECHNICIAN, THE PILOT STATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT HAD RECENTLY GONE THROUGH AN ANNUAL INSPECTION. HE REPORTED THAT ON THIS FLIGHT HE HAD CONDUCTED AN ENGINE RUN-UP WITH NO DISCREPANCIES NOTED. THE PILOT STATED THAT THE TAKEOFF ROLL WAS NORMAL; HOWEVER, ON THE INITIAL CLIMB HE NOTED A LOSS OF POWER AND A DECAY IN AIRSPEED. HE STATED THAT HE THOUGHT THERE WAS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE ENGINE. THE PILOT NOTED THAT HE "HAD RUN OUT OF RUNWAY," AND WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO LAND STRAIGHT AHEAD. HE STATED THAT HE TURNED BACK TO THE RUNWAY, AND AS HE WAS MAKING THE CROSSWIND TURN TO THE DOWNWIND LEG, THE LEFT WING DIPPED DOWN AND THE AIRCRAFT FELL 50 FEET TO THE GROUND. (.4)THIS WAS THE FIRST FLIGHT AFTER AN ANNUAL INSPECTION HAD BEEN PERFORMED. PRIOR TO THE INITIAL TAKEOFF, THE AIRPLANE WAS TAXI TESTED WITH NO DISCREPANCIES NOTED. THE PILOT STATED THAT THE ENGINE STARTED EASILY AND RAN SMOOTHLY AT LOWER RPM SETTINGS. AN ENGINE RUN-UP WAS CONDUCTED, WHICH INCLUDED A MAGNETO CHECK, WITH NO ANOMALIES EXPERIENCED. DURING THE TAKEOFF ROLL, THE PILOT NOTED THAT THE ENGINE DID NOT PRODUCE FULL POWER. HE ELECTED TO CONTINUE THE TAKEOFF, AND NOTED THAT THE RPM DID NOT GO ABOVE 1,600. HE ATTEMPTED TO TURN BACK TO THE RUNWAY TO LAND. AS HE MADE THE CROSSWIND TO DOWNWIND TURN, THE LEFT WING STALLED. THE AIRPLANE PITCHED DOWN AND FELL ABOUT 50 FEET TO THE GROUND. THE ENGINE WAS INSPECTED, AND FOUND TO HAVE WEAK COMPRESSION IN TWO CYLINDERS. THE EXAMINATION FURTHER REVEALED THAT THERE WERE LEAKS COMING FROM THE INTAKE AND EXHAUST VALVES OF BOTH CYLINDERS. NO FURTHER DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED. (-23)PILOT INITIATED TAKEOFF ROLL AND NEVER DEVELOPED FULL POWER. PILOT ELECTED TO CONTINUE TAKEOFF AND LOST FURTHER POWER AFTER AIRBORNE. PILOT ATTEMPTED TO RETURN TO THE RUNWAY, STALLED THE AIRCRAFT, AND CRASHED.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.