19990825042359A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Aimm AMT-300 · Block Island, RI · August 25, 1999

Date
August 25, 1999 · 17:49 local
Place
Block Island, RI
Airport
Block Island State
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N111TE
NTSB investigation
NTSBNYC99LA211
Reported as
Aimm AMT300
Reported engine
ROTAX ROTAX914
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
412 total40 in this make and model70 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

T was d pilot stated that, during takeoff, he was unable to clear trees at the end of the runway. He added that the normal takeoff distance for the powered glider was 800 feet. He did not know why the 2,501 foot long runway was not sufficient, but added that the engine was producing full power. He further stated that he should have aborted the takeoff. The pilot and passenger could not remember the position of the spoilers prior to takeoff. Examination of the wreckage by a federal aviation administration inspector did not reveal the pre-impact position of the spoilers. The inspector added that a large portion of the wreckage was consumed by fire. (-23) pilot started takeoff roll on rwy 28 and reported that the roll seemed a little longer than normal and that the engine was operating normally. Aircraft was rotated and best rate of climb established at 60 KTS. The landing gear was retracted and the aircraft was climbing at less than 100 feet per minute. The aircraft brushed the tops of some trees off the departure end of the runway, caught the right wing and then crashed inverted in some bayberry bushes. The right wing separated from the fuselage and the cockpi t was destroyed by post impact fire.

As the FAA filed it

T WAS D PILOT STATED THAT, DURING TAKEOFF, HE WAS UNABLE TO CLEAR TREES AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY. HE ADDED THAT THE NORMAL TAKEOFF DISTANCE FOR THE POWERED GLIDER WAS 800 FEET. HE DID NOT KNOW WHY THE 2,501 FOOT LONG RUNWAY WAS NOT SUFFICIENT, BUT ADDED THAT THE ENGINE WAS PRODUCING FULL POWER. HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE SHOULD HAVE ABORTED THE TAKEOFF. THE PILOT AND PASSENGER COULD NOT REMEMBER THE POSITION OF THE SPOILERS PRIOR TO TAKEOFF. EXAMINATION OF THE WRECKAGE BY A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION INSPECTOR DID NOT REVEAL THE PRE-IMPACT POSITION OF THE SPOILERS. THE INSPECTOR ADDED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE WRECKAGE WAS CONSUMED BY FIRE. (-23) PILOT STARTED TAKEOFF ROLL ON RWY 28 AND REPORTED THAT THE ROLL SEEMED A LITTLE LONGER THAN NORMAL AND THAT THE ENGINE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. AIRCRAFT WAS ROTATED AND BEST RATE OF CLIMB ESTABLISHED AT 60 KTS. THE LANDING GEAR WAS RETRACTED AND THE AIRCRAFT WAS CLIMBING AT LESS THAN 100 FEET PER MINUTE. THE AIRCRAFT BRUSHED THE TOPS OF SOME TREES OFF THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY, CAUGHT THE RIGHT WING AND THEN CRASHED INVERTED IN SOME BAYBERRY BUSHES. THE RIGHT WING SEPARATED FROM THE FUSELAGE AND THE COCKPI T WAS DESTROYED BY POST IMPACT FIRE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.