19990920042639A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 177A · Big Bear, CA · September 20, 1999

Date
September 20, 1999 · 11:39 local
Place
Big Bear, CA
Airport
Big Bear City Airport
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N39AE
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX99LA314
Reported as
Cessna 177A
Reported engine
Lycoming O360A2F
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
13,099 total400 in this make and model120 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.4)The aircraft was parked outside on the ramp for several months, with the fuel drains removed and the tanks drained. An A&P mechanic replaced the fuel drain in the right tank and added fuel for a maintenance ferry flight. The pilot performed a preflight and before takeoff checks. The engine stalled once during taxi, then began to miss and run roughly after takeoff. After returning, the pilot drained the fuel sumps and found a 'small amount of water' in the gascolator. He then drained an additional gallon of fuel from the tank without finding any additional water or sediment. After takeoff on the second flight, the engine began surging and then quit. When attempts to restart the engine failed, he turned back toward the airport but could not reach the runway and ditched the airplane in the water. The mechanic did not perform or offer to perform any additional troubleshooting procedures between the first and second flight. The inside of the gascolator was coated with an insoluble greenish-brown film. The left wing fuel quantity transmitter was coated with material that was similar in appearance to a non-silicon sealant. The material was decomposing and readily flaked off when touched. About 10CC of liquid was recovered from the fuel reservoir; about half was water, with a heavier sediment that was similar in color and consistency as to the material coating the fuel quantity transmitter. The above noted discrepancies were located in areas that would not be accessible or serviceable by a pilot performing a preflight inspection.

As the FAA filed it

(.4)THE AIRCRAFT WAS PARKED OUTSIDE ON THE RAMP FOR SEVERAL MONTHS, WITH THE FUEL DRAINS REMOVED AND THE TANKS DRAINED. AN A&P MECHANIC REPLACED THE FUEL DRAIN IN THE RIGHT TANK AND ADDED FUEL FOR A MAINTENANCE FERRY FLIGHT. THE PILOT PERFORMED A PREFLIGHT AND BEFORE TAKEOFF CHECKS. THE ENGINE STALLED ONCE DURING TAXI, THEN BEGAN TO MISS AND RUN ROUGHLY AFTER TAKEOFF. AFTER RETURNING, THE PILOT DRAINED THE FUEL SUMPS AND FOUND A 'SMALL AMOUNT OF WATER' IN THE GASCOLATOR. HE THEN DRAINED AN ADDITIONAL GALLON OF FUEL FROM THE TANK WITHOUT FINDING ANY ADDITIONAL WATER OR SEDIMENT. AFTER TAKEOFF ON THE SECOND FLIGHT, THE ENGINE BEGAN SURGING AND THEN QUIT. WHEN ATTEMPTS TO RESTART THE ENGINE FAILED, HE TURNED BACK TOWARD THE AIRPORT BUT COULD NOT REACH THE RUNWAY AND DITCHED THE AIRPLANE IN THE WATER. THE MECHANIC DID NOT PERFORM OR OFFER TO PERFORM ANY ADDITIONAL TROUBLESHOOTING PROCEDURES BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND FLIGHT. THE INSIDE OF THE GASCOLATOR WAS COATED WITH AN INSOLUBLE GREENISH-BROWN FILM. THE LEFT WING FUEL QUANTITY TRANSMITTER WAS COATED WITH MATERIAL THAT WAS SIMILAR IN APPEARANCE TO A NON-SILICON SEALANT. THE MATERIAL WAS DECOMPOSING AND READILY FLAKED OFF WHEN TOUCHED. ABOUT 10CC OF LIQUID WAS RECOVERED FROM THE FUEL RESERVOIR; ABOUT HALF WAS WATER, WITH A HEAVIER SEDIMENT THAT WAS SIMILAR IN COLOR AND CONSISTENCY AS TO THE MATERIAL COATING THE FUEL QUANTITY TRANSMITTER. THE ABOVE NOTED DISCREPANCIES WERE LOCATED IN AREAS THAT WOULD NOT BE ACCESSIBLE OR SERVICEABLE BY A PILOT PERFORMING A PREFLIGHT INSPECTION.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.