19991014028779I

Incident

FAA incident report · Doug DC-9-32 · October 14, 1999

Date
October 14, 1999 · 12:00 local
Phase of flight
Climb
Operating rules
Air carrier (Part 121)
Operator
NWAA
Aircraft
N610NW
Reported as
Doug DC932
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney JT8D9A

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Flight 582 enroute from stl to msp - during climbout, ATC informed flight crew of black smoke coming from engine #2. Crew observed oil quantity had dropped to 5 qts from 14 at pre-flight inspection. Crew made emergency landing. No injuries or aircraft damage. Company contract maintenance determined engine oil tank cap was not installed causing oil depletion no damage to oil cap or tank filler port. After reservicing, crew and contract maintenance ran engines to insure no possible anomolies existed. Company procedures and log annotations were complied with. Flight was rescheduled. After interviewing the mechanic responsible, determined this to be an honest mistake. The mechanic was cooperative and open to verbal counseling.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) FLIGHT 582 ENROUTE FROM STL TO MSP - DURING CLIMBOUT, ATC INFORMED FLIGHT CREW OF BLACK SMOKE COMING FROM ENGINE #2. CREW OBSERVED OIL QUANTITY HAD DROPPED TO 5 QTS FROM 14 AT PRE-FLIGHT INSPECTION. CREW MADE EMERGENCY LANDING. NO INJURIES OR AIRCRAFT DAMAGE. COMPANY CONTRACT MAINTENANCE DETERMINED ENGINE OIL TANK CAP WAS NOT INSTALLED CAUSING OIL DEPLETION NO DAMAGE TO OIL CAP OR TANK FILLER PORT. AFTER RESERVICING, CREW AND CONTRACT MAINTENANCE RAN ENGINES TO INSURE NO POSSIBLE ANOMOLIES EXISTED. COMPANY PROCEDURES AND LOG ANNOTATIONS WERE COMPLIED WITH. FLIGHT WAS RESCHEDULED. AFTER INTERVIEWING THE MECHANIC RESPONSIBLE, DETERMINED THIS TO BE AN HONEST MISTAKE. THE MECHANIC WAS COOPERATIVE AND OPEN TO VERBAL COUNSELING.