20000701020519I

Incident · Substantial damage

FAA incident report · Amtr BENSEN820B · Ebensburg, PA · July 1, 2000

Date
July 1, 2000 · 14:10 local
Place
Ebensburg, PA
Airport
Ebensburg Airport
Phase of flight
Ground Taxi, Other Airplane
Operating rules
Ultralight vehicle (Part 103)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
NONE
Reported as
Amtr BENSEN820B
Fatal injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23)The following narrative was derived from an on scene investigation and interview of the operator by personnel of the allegheny FSDO. During taxi operations on a grass runway, a homebuilt gyrocopter hit a runway side marker (55 gal. Drum cut in half) and flipped over. Aircraft main rotor support broken, main rotor damaged, and propeller was broken. Operator suffered minor injuries. Operator stated he had no intent to fly, just getting used to handling the aircraft on the ground. Operator also stated that he understood the aircraft was considered to be an ultralight and that he required no formal training of license. He said he read books and had viewed several videos. He felt eventually he would be able to the fly the aircraft.

As the FAA filed it

(-23)THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE WAS DERIVED FROM AN ON SCENE INVESTIGATION AND INTERVIEW OF THE OPERATOR BY PERSONNEL OF THE ALLEGHENY FSDO. DURING TAXI OPERATIONS ON A GRASS RUNWAY, A HOMEBUILT GYROCOPTER HIT A RUNWAY SIDE MARKER (55 GAL. DRUM CUT IN HALF) AND FLIPPED OVER. AIRCRAFT MAIN ROTOR SUPPORT BROKEN, MAIN ROTOR DAMAGED, AND PROPELLER WAS BROKEN. OPERATOR SUFFERED MINOR INJURIES. OPERATOR STATED HE HAD NO INTENT TO FLY, JUST GETTING USED TO HANDLING THE AIRCRAFT ON THE GROUND. OPERATOR ALSO STATED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD THE AIRCRAFT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE AN ULTRALIGHT AND THAT HE REQUIRED NO FORMAL TRAINING OF LICENSE. HE SAID HE READ BOOKS AND HAD VIEWED SEVERAL VIDEOS. HE FELT EVENTUALLY HE WOULD BE ABLE TO THE FLY THE AIRCRAFT.