20000815009849A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Amtr Q200 · Corona, CA · August 15, 2000

Date
August 15, 2000 · 10:03 local
Place
Corona, CA
Phase of flight
Fcd/Prec Ldg From Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N8427
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX00LA301
Reported as
Amtr Q200
Reported engine
Continental O200A
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
2,902 total4 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Attachment of narrative (.4) on August 15, 2000, at 1003 hours pacific daylight time, an amateur-built follmer Q200 airplane, N8427, collided with ground obstructions during a forced landing on an interstate highway in Corona, California. The forced landing was precipitated by an in-flight separation of a portion of one propeller blade. The aircraft was operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91 of the federal aviation regulations. The airplane was destroyed in the accident sequence. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area personal flight that had originated from the chino, California, airport about 0945. An federal aviation administration (FAA) airworthiness inspector from the riverside, California, flight standards district office responded to the accident site and examined the airplane and interviewed the pilot. The pilot reported that the airplane was in cruise flight when it suddenly began to shake violently. The pilot believed he had lost part of the wooden propeller and turned to return to the chino airport. The shaking through the airframe became intense and the pilot was unsure of the continued integrity of the airframe. He decided to land on a major interstate highway beneath the airplane. During the landing rollout, the airplane was quickly catching up to automobiles on the road ahead and the pilot intentionally steered the airplane to the right shoulder to avoid a collision with the vehicles. The right wing contacted a light pole and slued the airplane nose first into another pole. The second collision with the pole shattered the propeller into small splinters. The airplane continued down an embankment and collided with additional brush. The FAA inspector searched the area and was able to identify one propeller blade tip in the propeller fragments scattered over the site. The second tip could not be located. According to the pilot, the aircraft owner built the airplane prior to 1990 and obtained an initial airworthiness and registration certificate, then placed the airplane into storage in a hangar at the chino airport. The airplane did not fly from 1990 until weeks before the accident. The pilot was in the process of flying the initial 40 operating hours for an unrestricted experimental airworthiness certificate and had flown the airplane about 11 hours.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ATTACHMENT OF NARRATIVE (.4) ON AUGUST 15, 2000, AT 1003 HOURS PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME, AN AMATEUR-BUILT FOLLMER Q200 AIRPLANE, N8427, COLLIDED WITH GROUND OBSTRUCTIONS DURING A FORCED LANDING ON AN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY IN CORONA, CALIFORNIA. THE FORCED LANDING WAS PRECIPITATED BY AN IN-FLIGHT SEPARATION OF A PORTION OF ONE PROPELLER BLADE. THE AIRCRAFT WAS OPERATED BY THE PILOT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91 OF THE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS. THE AIRPLANE WAS DESTROYED IN THE ACCIDENT SEQUENCE. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED FOR THE LOCAL AREA PERSONAL FLIGHT THAT HAD ORIGINATED FROM THE CHINO, CALIFORNIA, AIRPORT ABOUT 0945. AN FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTOR FROM THE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, FLIGHT STANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE RESPONDED TO THE ACCIDENT SITE AND EXAMINED THE AIRPLANE AND INTERVIEWED THE PILOT. THE PILOT REPORTED THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS IN CRUISE FLIGHT WHEN IT SUDDENLY BEGAN TO SHAKE VIOLENTLY. THE PILOT BELIEVED HE HAD LOST PART OF THE WOODEN PROPELLER AND TURNED TO RETURN TO THE CHINO AIRPORT. THE SHAKING THROUGH THE AIRFRAME BECAME INTENSE AND THE PILOT WAS UNSURE OF THE CONTINUED INTEGRITY OF THE AIRFRAME. HE DECIDED TO LAND ON A MAJOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY BENEATH THE AIRPLANE. DURING THE LANDING ROLLOUT, THE AIRPLANE WAS QUICKLY CATCHING UP TO AUTOMOBILES ON THE ROAD AHEAD AND THE PILOT INTENTIONALLY STEERED THE AIRPLANE TO THE RIGHT SHOULDER TO AVOID A COLLISION WITH THE VEHICLES. THE RIGHT WING CONTACTED A LIGHT POLE AND SLUED THE AIRPLANE NOSE FIRST INTO ANOTHER POLE. THE SECOND COLLISION WITH THE POLE SHATTERED THE PROPELLER INTO SMALL SPLINTERS. THE AIRPLANE CONTINUED DOWN AN EMBANKMENT AND COLLIDED WITH ADDITIONAL BRUSH. THE FAA INSPECTOR SEARCHED THE AREA AND WAS ABLE TO IDENTIFY ONE PROPELLER BLADE TIP IN THE PROPELLER FRAGMENTS SCATTERED OVER THE SITE. THE SECOND TIP COULD NOT BE LOCATED. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, THE AIRCRAFT OWNER BUILT THE AIRPLANE PRIOR TO 1990 AND OBTAINED AN INITIAL AIRWORTHINESS AND REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE, THEN PLACED THE AIRPLANE INTO STORAGE IN A HANGAR AT THE CHINO AIRPORT. THE AIRPLANE DID NOT FLY FROM 1990 UNTIL WEEKS BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. THE PILOT WAS IN THE PROCESS OF FLYING THE INITIAL 40 OPERATING HOURS FOR AN UNRESTRICTED EXPERIMENTAL AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE AND HAD FLOWN THE AIRPLANE ABOUT 11 HOURS.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.