20000825010649A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 182Q · Fayetteville, TN · August 25, 2000

Date
August 25, 2000 · 09:30 local
Place
Fayetteville, TN
Airport
Fayetteville Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N759CW
NTSB investigation
NTSBMIA00LA247
Reported as
Cessna 182Q
Reported engine
Continental O470U
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
509 total182 in this make and model4 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot states that after rotation, at an altitude of 10 feet, the engine faultered (lost power) and then regained power. The a/c had already began a descent to the runway and the resulting impact causing damage to the nosewheel assembly, affecting the firewall, and allowing for propeller strikage. Pilot states that after impact with power restored a go around was initiated dur to lack of sufficient remaining runway. (.4)the pilot stated that during climbout, after reaching about 10 feet above the ground, the airplane's engine lost power, then restarted. She further stated that the airplane had started dropping to the runway when it lost power, and it impacted the runway. One witness, an FAA licensed mechanic, with inspection authorization, stated that he heard and observed the takeoff, and the airplane lifted off about the mid-length of the runway, and had ascended to an altitude of about 10 feet, prior to descending and impacting the runway with a loud popping sound. He said that after the impact, a go-around was executed, followed by an uneventful landing. The mechanic said that engine sounded normal, as if it had been developing full power the whole time, with the only a slight fluctuation in sound that corresponded with the propeller strike. The mechanic further stated that he conducted a post accident examination of the aircraft found that it had incurred substantial damage. The mechanic further stated that he found no preexisting problems with the aircraft that would have caused the accident.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT STATES THAT AFTER ROTATION, AT AN ALTITUDE OF 10 FEET, THE ENGINE FAULTERED (LOST POWER) AND THEN REGAINED POWER. THE A/C HAD ALREADY BEGAN A DESCENT TO THE RUNWAY AND THE RESULTING IMPACT CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE NOSEWHEEL ASSEMBLY, AFFECTING THE FIREWALL, AND ALLOWING FOR PROPELLER STRIKAGE. PILOT STATES THAT AFTER IMPACT WITH POWER RESTORED A GO AROUND WAS INITIATED DUR TO LACK OF SUFFICIENT REMAINING RUNWAY. (.4)THE PILOT STATED THAT DURING CLIMBOUT, AFTER REACHING ABOUT 10 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND, THE AIRPLANE'S ENGINE LOST POWER, THEN RESTARTED. SHE FURTHER STATED THAT THE AIRPLANE HAD STARTED DROPPING TO THE RUNWAY WHEN IT LOST POWER, AND IT IMPACTED THE RUNWAY. ONE WITNESS, AN FAA LICENSED MECHANIC, WITH INSPECTION AUTHORIZATION, STATED THAT HE HEARD AND OBSERVED THE TAKEOFF, AND THE AIRPLANE LIFTED OFF ABOUT THE MID-LENGTH OF THE RUNWAY, AND HAD ASCENDED TO AN ALTITUDE OF ABOUT 10 FEET, PRIOR TO DESCENDING AND IMPACTING THE RUNWAY WITH A LOUD POPPING SOUND. HE SAID THAT AFTER THE IMPACT, A GO-AROUND WAS EXECUTED, FOLLOWED BY AN UNEVENTFUL LANDING. THE MECHANIC SAID THAT ENGINE SOUNDED NORMAL, AS IF IT HAD BEEN DEVELOPING FULL POWER THE WHOLE TIME, WITH THE ONLY A SLIGHT FLUCTUATION IN SOUND THAT CORRESPONDED WITH THE PROPELLER STRIKE. THE MECHANIC FURTHER STATED THAT HE CONDUCTED A POST ACCIDENT EXAMINATION OF THE AIRCRAFT FOUND THAT IT HAD INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE MECHANIC FURTHER STATED THAT HE FOUND NO PREEXISTING PROBLEMS WITH THE AIRCRAFT THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED THE ACCIDENT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.