20000827016099A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Amtr PITTS S1-T · Vero Beach, FL · August 27, 2000

Date
August 27, 2000 · 09:45 local
Place
Vero Beach, FL
Phase of flight
Descent
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N112JG
NTSB investigation
NTSBMIA00LA252
Reported as
Amtr PITTSS1T
Reported engine
Continental IO360*
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
1
Pilot’s flight hours
312 total90 in this make and model10 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot departed ufro airport at approx. 8:45 am sun, 8/27/00, discovered a/c in orange groove approv. 5 miles sw of airport. Position of a/c suggested high speed and low forward speed. Investigation of a/c showed no internal damage to engine, residual fuel in a/c components, plugs normal, prop separated from engine showed evidence of tortional overload. privacy data omitted (.4) N112JG, an experimental amateur built pitts model S1-T, was found in an orange grove, about 5 miles southwest of the airport, with the pilot in the aircraft. There were no witnesses to the accident. According to an FAA inspector and a representative from the engine manufacturer, who conducted the postcrash examination, the fuselage and bottom wings exhibited compression damage, consistent with that of an aircraft near a flat attitude, with little sign of forward movement. Both main landing gear assemblies had been crushed, while the cockpit, empennage and top wing had been relatively undamaged. The engine manufacturer's representative said that there had been crushing damage to the bottom engine cowl, and the propeller and crankshaft s howed that there was damage consistent with rotation at impact. The engine manufacturer's representative also said that there was no evidence of any preimpact mechanical failure or malfunction to the engine that would have prevented it from producing power. The NTSB examined components of the engine's fuel injection system, and no anomalies were noted which would have prevented the engine from producing power.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT DEPARTED UFRO AIRPORT AT APPROX. 8:45 AM SUN, 8/27/00, DISCOVERED A/C IN ORANGE GROOVE APPROV. 5 MILES SW OF AIRPORT. POSITION OF A/C SUGGESTED HIGH SPEED AND LOW FORWARD SPEED. INVESTIGATION OF A/C SHOWED NO INTERNAL DAMAGE TO ENGINE, RESIDUAL FUEL IN A/C COMPONENTS, PLUGS NORMAL, PROP SEPARATED FROM ENGINE SHOWED EVIDENCE OF TORTIONAL OVERLOAD. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ (.4) N112JG, AN EXPERIMENTAL AMATEUR BUILT PITTS MODEL S1-T, WAS FOUND IN AN ORANGE GROVE, ABOUT 5 MILES SOUTHWEST OF THE AIRPORT, WITH THE PILOT IN THE AIRCRAFT. THERE WERE NO WITNESSES TO THE ACCIDENT. ACCORDING TO AN FAA INSPECTOR AND A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE ENGINE MANUFACTURER, WHO CONDUCTED THE POSTCRASH EXAMINATION, THE FUSELAGE AND BOTTOM WINGS EXHIBITED COMPRESSION DAMAGE, CONSISTENT WITH THAT OF AN AIRCRAFT NEAR A FLAT ATTITUDE, WITH LITTLE SIGN OF FORWARD MOVEMENT. BOTH MAIN LANDING GEAR ASSEMBLIES HAD BEEN CRUSHED, WHILE THE COCKPIT, EMPENNAGE AND TOP WING HAD BEEN RELATIVELY UNDAMAGED. THE ENGINE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE SAID THAT THERE HAD BEEN CRUSHING DAMAGE TO THE BOTTOM ENGINE COWL, AND THE PROPELLER AND CRANKSHAFT S HOWED THAT THERE WAS DAMAGE CONSISTENT WITH ROTATION AT IMPACT. THE ENGINE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALSO SAID THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY PREIMPACT MECHANICAL FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION TO THE ENGINE THAT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED IT FROM PRODUCING POWER. THE NTSB EXAMINED COMPONENTS OF THE ENGINE'S FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM, AND NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED WHICH WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE ENGINE FROM PRODUCING POWER.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.