20010408006259A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-24-250 · Chino, CA · April 8, 2001

Date
April 8, 2001 · 17:30 local
Place
Chino, CA
Airport
Chino Airport
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N6240P
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX01LA148
Reported as
Piper PA24250
Reported engine
Lycoming O540A1C5
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
4,000 total2,400 in this make and model

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) N6240P landed gear up on runway 26R at the Chino Airport, Chino, CA. The pilot had made a go around on runway 26L. Just prior to the gear up landing and forgot that he had retracted the gear and flaps. The pilot believed that he failed to hear the gear warning system because he was not used to his new noise attenuating head phones that reduced the pitch of the audible warning. (.19)on April 8, 2001, about 1730 hours PDT, a Piper PA-24-250, N6240P, sustained substantial damage when it made a wheels up landing on runway 26 at Chino, California. The commercial pilot/owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The personal flight departed corona, California, about 1720. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. This occurrence was upgraded to an accident on April 19,2001, after an inspection revealed damage to structural airframe components. The federal aviation asministration (FAA) accident coordinator interviewed the pilot. The pilot said he initiated a go-around on his first attempted landing beca use the runway wasn't clear. He forgot that he raised his landing gear. He was wearing a new noise-attenuating headset that changed the sounds he normally heard when flying his airplane. He did not recognize the gear warning horn during the accident landing. He recalled that the gear warning horn was still sounding as he removed his headset. (.4) on April 8, 2001, about 1730 hours pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-24-250, N6240P, sustained substantial damage when it made a wheels up landing on runway 26 at Chino, California. The commercial pilot/owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The personal flight departed corona, California, about 1720. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. This occurrence was upgraded to an accident on April 19, 2001, after an inspection revealed damage to structural airframe components. The federal aviation administration accident coordinator interviewed the pilot. The pilot said he initiated a go-around on his first attempted landing because the runway wasn't clear. He forgot that he raised his landing gea r. he was wearing a new noise attenuating headset that changed the sounds he normally heard when flying his airplane. He did not recognize the gear warning horn during the accident landing. He recalled that the gear warning horn was still sounding as he removed his headset.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) N6240P LANDED GEAR UP ON RUNWAY 26R AT THE CHINO AIRPORT, CHINO, CA. THE PILOT HAD MADE A GO AROUND ON RUNWAY 26L. JUST PRIOR TO THE GEAR UP LANDING AND FORGOT THAT HE HAD RETRACTED THE GEAR AND FLAPS. THE PILOT BELIEVED THAT HE FAILED TO HEAR THE GEAR WARNING SYSTEM BECAUSE HE WAS NOT USED TO HIS NEW NOISE ATTENUATING HEAD PHONES THAT REDUCED THE PITCH OF THE AUDIBLE WARNING. (.19)ON APRIL 8, 2001, ABOUT 1730 HOURS PDT, A PIPER PA-24-250, N6240P, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE WHEN IT MADE A WHEELS UP LANDING ON RUNWAY 26 AT CHINO, CALIFORNIA. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT/OWNER WAS OPERATING THE AIRPLANE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. THE PERSONAL FLIGHT DEPARTED CORONA, CALIFORNIA, ABOUT 1720. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THIS OCCURRENCE WAS UPGRADED TO AN ACCIDENT ON APRIL 19,2001, AFTER AN INSPECTION REVEALED DAMAGE TO STRUCTURAL AIRFRAME COMPONENTS. THE FEDERAL AVIATION ASMINISTRATION (FAA) ACCIDENT COORDINATOR INTERVIEWED THE PILOT. THE PILOT SAID HE INITIATED A GO-AROUND ON HIS FIRST ATTEMPTED LANDING BECA USE THE RUNWAY WASN'T CLEAR. HE FORGOT THAT HE RAISED HIS LANDING GEAR. HE WAS WEARING A NEW NOISE-ATTENUATING HEADSET THAT CHANGED THE SOUNDS HE NORMALLY HEARD WHEN FLYING HIS AIRPLANE. HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE GEAR WARNING HORN DURING THE ACCIDENT LANDING. HE RECALLED THAT THE GEAR WARNING HORN WAS STILL SOUNDING AS HE REMOVED HIS HEADSET. (.4) ON APRIL 8, 2001, ABOUT 1730 HOURS PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME, A PIPER PA-24-250, N6240P, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE WHEN IT MADE A WHEELS UP LANDING ON RUNWAY 26 AT CHINO, CALIFORNIA. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT/OWNER WAS OPERATING THE AIRPLANE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. THE PERSONAL FLIGHT DEPARTED CORONA, CALIFORNIA, ABOUT 1720. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THIS OCCURRENCE WAS UPGRADED TO AN ACCIDENT ON APRIL 19, 2001, AFTER AN INSPECTION REVEALED DAMAGE TO STRUCTURAL AIRFRAME COMPONENTS. THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ACCIDENT COORDINATOR INTERVIEWED THE PILOT. THE PILOT SAID HE INITIATED A GO-AROUND ON HIS FIRST ATTEMPTED LANDING BECAUSE THE RUNWAY WASN'T CLEAR. HE FORGOT THAT HE RAISED HIS LANDING GEA R. HE WAS WEARING A NEW NOISE ATTENUATING HEADSET THAT CHANGED THE SOUNDS HE NORMALLY HEARD WHEN FLYING HIS AIRPLANE. HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE GEAR WARNING HORN DURING THE ACCIDENT LANDING. HE RECALLED THAT THE GEAR WARNING HORN WAS STILL SOUNDING AS HE REMOVED HIS HEADSET.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.