20010518018039A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-18-150 · Tucson, AZ · May 18, 2001

Date
May 18, 2001 · 10:30 local
Place
Tucson, AZ
Airport
El Tiro Gliderport
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N8524Y
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX01LA180
Reported as
Piper PA18150
Reported engine
Lycoming O320*
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
2,400 total150 in this make and model40 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The pilot stated that when he took off, the aircraft engine quit at about 100 to 200 feet AGL. The aircraft hit a fence and sustained substantial damage to the right wing, fuselage, propeller and right landing gear. Subsequent investigation revealed the fuel select lever was in the off position. The pilot stated that he had recently been flying Cessna aircraft and that the lever appeared to be in the correct location. It is the intention of this office to re-exam Mr. Rovey under the 44709 act. (.19) on may 18, 2001, at 1030 hours mountain standard time, a Piper PA18-150, N8524Y, lost power on takeoff and made a forced landing in an open field. The airplane sustained substantial damage on the landing rollout after it struck the airport perimeter fence at the El Tiro Gliderport, Tucson, Arizona. The airplane was operated by the Tucson soaring club, inc., under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight. No flight plan had been filed. The safety board investigator-in-charge (iic) interviewed the pilot. The pilot stated that this was the first flig ht of the day prior to towing gliders, to make sure that the airplane was working properly. He conducted a preflight, which included visually verifying that the fuel selector was in the proper position. The pilot saw the fuel selector pointing towards the left and it did not register that it was in the off position. No discrepancies were noted during the startup, run-up or takeoff roll. About midfield the engine started to sputter and quit. The pilot attempted to slip the airplane to land inside the airport perimeter fence. He stated that during the slip the engine caught and provided enough power that he was unable to make the landing and struck the perimeter fence. The pilot stated that he had been flying a Cessna 120 that has a similar looking fuel selector, but operates opposite of the accident airplane. He further indicated that the airplane had been refueled the night before and no mechanical anomalies were noted with the airplane. (.4) on may 18, 2001, at 1030 hours mountain standard time, a Piper PA18-150, N8524Y, lost power on takeoff and made a forced landing in an open field. The airplane sustained substantial damage on the landing rollout after it struck the airport perimeter fence at the El Tiro Gliderport, Tucson, Arizona. The airplane was operated by the Tucson soaring club, inc., under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight. No flight plan had been filed. The safety board investigator-in-charge (iic) interviewed the pilot. The pilot stated that this was the first flight of the day prior to towing gliders, to make sure that the airplane was working properly. He conducted a preflight, which included visually verifying that the fuel selector was in the proper position. The pilot saw the fuel selector pointing towards the left, and it did not register that it was in the off position. No discrepancies were noted during the startup, run-up, or takeoff roll. In the pilot's written statement to the safety board, he stated that when the engine quit, about 200-300 feet off the ground, he applied full flaps and attempted to "slip" the airplane down to land on the remaining runway. He also stated that he did not believe that he had enough altitude to make a turn back to land on runway 26. When he nosed the airplane down during the slip, the engine caught and "surprised" him because it was producing power. He stated that he stopped the slip "in hopes" of making it over the perimeter fence. He checked to make sure the mixture was rich and placed his hand on the fuel selector. He found that it was slightly out of position, and moved the selector into the detent with the handle facing forward. He reported that the engine quit a second time, and he attempted to glide to land on a road on the other side of the perimeter fence. He stated that he did not retract the flaps. The pilot indicated that the airplane landed just short of the perimeter fence. The left wing struck a tree and the right main landing gear collapsed and bent the right wing. The airplane stopped just past the fence near the road. The pilot stated that he failed to ensure that the fuel selector valve was in the correct position prior to takeoff. He glanced at it as he got in the airplane and thought that it was in the correct position - handle pointing forward instead of backward so that the arrow was pointing forward toward the correct fuel tank. He further stated that in the Cessna 140 that he had been flying, which has a similar looking fuel selector, when a tank is selected the handle points away from the desired tank. He stated that this is opposite of the Piper 18-180. The pilot also indicated that the last pilot to fly the airplane placed the fuel selector in the off position the night before the accident. He indicated that this was not standard procedure for the company.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE PILOT STATED THAT WHEN HE TOOK OFF, THE AIRCRAFT ENGINE QUIT AT ABOUT 100 TO 200 FEET AGL. THE AIRCRAFT HIT A FENCE AND SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT WING, FUSELAGE, PROPELLER AND RIGHT LANDING GEAR. SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FUEL SELECT LEVER WAS IN THE OFF POSITION. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE HAD RECENTLY BEEN FLYING CESSNA AIRCRAFT AND THAT THE LEVER APPEARED TO BE IN THE CORRECT LOCATION. IT IS THE INTENTION OF THIS OFFICE TO RE-EXAM MR. ROVEY UNDER THE 44709 ACT. (.19) ON MAY 18, 2001, AT 1030 HOURS MOUNTAIN STANDARD TIME, A PIPER PA18-150, N8524Y, LOST POWER ON TAKEOFF AND MADE A FORCED LANDING IN AN OPEN FIELD. THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE ON THE LANDING ROLLOUT AFTER IT STRUCK THE AIRPORT PERIMETER FENCE AT THE EL TIRO GLIDERPORT, TUCSON, ARIZONA. THE AIRPLANE WAS OPERATED BY THE TUCSON SOARING CLUB, INC., UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED FOR THE LOCAL FLIGHT. NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THE SAFETY BOARD INVESTIGATOR-IN-CHARGE (IIC) INTERVIEWED THE PILOT. THE PILOT STATED THAT THIS WAS THE FIRST FLIG HT OF THE DAY PRIOR TO TOWING GLIDERS, TO MAKE SURE THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS WORKING PROPERLY. HE CONDUCTED A PREFLIGHT, WHICH INCLUDED VISUALLY VERIFYING THAT THE FUEL SELECTOR WAS IN THE PROPER POSITION. THE PILOT SAW THE FUEL SELECTOR POINTING TOWARDS THE LEFT AND IT DID NOT REGISTER THAT IT WAS IN THE OFF POSITION. NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED DURING THE STARTUP, RUN-UP OR TAKEOFF ROLL. ABOUT MIDFIELD THE ENGINE STARTED TO SPUTTER AND QUIT. THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO SLIP THE AIRPLANE TO LAND INSIDE THE AIRPORT PERIMETER FENCE. HE STATED THAT DURING THE SLIP THE ENGINE CAUGHT AND PROVIDED ENOUGH POWER THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO MAKE THE LANDING AND STRUCK THE PERIMETER FENCE. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN FLYING A CESSNA 120 THAT HAS A SIMILAR LOOKING FUEL SELECTOR, BUT OPERATES OPPOSITE OF THE ACCIDENT AIRPLANE. HE FURTHER INDICATED THAT THE AIRPLANE HAD BEEN REFUELED THE NIGHT BEFORE AND NO MECHANICAL ANOMALIES WERE NOTED WITH THE AIRPLANE. (.4) ON MAY 18, 2001, AT 1030 HOURS MOUNTAIN STANDARD TIME, A PIPER PA18-150, N8524Y, LOST POWER ON TAKEOFF AND MADE A FORCED LANDING IN AN OPEN FIELD. THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE ON THE LANDING ROLLOUT AFTER IT STRUCK THE AIRPORT PERIMETER FENCE AT THE EL TIRO GLIDERPORT, TUCSON, ARIZONA. THE AIRPLANE WAS OPERATED BY THE TUCSON SOARING CLUB, INC., UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED FOR THE LOCAL FLIGHT. NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THE SAFETY BOARD INVESTIGATOR-IN-CHARGE (IIC) INTERVIEWED THE PILOT. THE PILOT STATED THAT THIS WAS THE FIRST FLIGHT OF THE DAY PRIOR TO TOWING GLIDERS, TO MAKE SURE THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS WORKING PROPERLY. HE CONDUCTED A PREFLIGHT, WHICH INCLUDED VISUALLY VERIFYING THAT THE FUEL SELECTOR WAS IN THE PROPER POSITION. THE PILOT SAW THE FUEL SELECTOR POINTING TOWARDS THE LEFT, AND IT DID NOT REGISTER THAT IT WAS IN THE OFF POSITION. NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED DURING THE STARTUP, RUN-UP, OR TAKEOFF ROLL. IN THE PILOT'S WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE SAFETY BOARD, HE STATED THAT WHEN THE ENGINE QUIT, ABOUT 200-300 FEET OFF THE GROUND, HE APPLIED FULL FLAPS AND ATTEMPTED TO "SLIP" THE AIRPLANE DOWN TO LAND ON THE REMAINING RUNWAY. HE ALSO STATED THAT HE DID NOT BELIEVE THAT HE HAD ENOUGH ALTITUDE TO MAKE A TURN BACK TO LAND ON RUNWAY 26. WHEN HE NOSED THE AIRPLANE DOWN DURING THE SLIP, THE ENGINE CAUGHT AND "SURPRISED" HIM BECAUSE IT WAS PRODUCING POWER. HE STATED THAT HE STOPPED THE SLIP "IN HOPES" OF MAKING IT OVER THE PERIMETER FENCE. HE CHECKED TO MAKE SURE THE MIXTURE WAS RICH AND PLACED HIS HAND ON THE FUEL SELECTOR. HE FOUND THAT IT WAS SLIGHTLY OUT OF POSITION, AND MOVED THE SELECTOR INTO THE DETENT WITH THE HANDLE FACING FORWARD. HE REPORTED THAT THE ENGINE QUIT A SECOND TIME, AND HE ATTEMPTED TO GLIDE TO LAND ON A ROAD ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PERIMETER FENCE. HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT RETRACT THE FLAPS. THE PILOT INDICATED THAT THE AIRPLANE LANDED JUST SHORT OF THE PERIMETER FENCE. THE LEFT WING STRUCK A TREE AND THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED AND BENT THE RIGHT WING. THE AIRPLANE STOPPED JUST PAST THE FENCE NEAR THE ROAD. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FUEL SELECTOR VALVE WAS IN THE CORRECT POSITION PRIOR TO TAKEOFF. HE GLANCED AT IT AS HE GOT IN THE AIRPLANE AND THOUGHT THAT IT WAS IN THE CORRECT POSITION - HANDLE POINTING FORWARD INSTEAD OF BACKWARD SO THAT THE ARROW WAS POINTING FORWARD TOWARD THE CORRECT FUEL TANK. HE FURTHER STATED THAT IN THE CESSNA 140 THAT HE HAD BEEN FLYING, WHICH HAS A SIMILAR LOOKING FUEL SELECTOR, WHEN A TANK IS SELECTED THE HANDLE POINTS AWAY FROM THE DESIRED TANK. HE STATED THAT THIS IS OPPOSITE OF THE PIPER 18-180. THE PILOT ALSO INDICATED THAT THE LAST PILOT TO FLY THE AIRPLANE PLACED THE FUEL SELECTOR IN THE OFF POSITION THE NIGHT BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. HE INDICATED THAT THIS WAS NOT STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR THE COMPANY.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.