20010625017179A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 172M · Napa, CA · June 25, 2001

Date
June 25, 2001 · 09:20 local
Place
Napa, CA
Airport
Napa County Airport
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N1409V
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX01LA221
Reported as
Cessna 172M
Reported engine
Lycoming O320E2D
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
898 total343 in this make and model237 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Post accident investigation revealed a bent pushrod on #1 cylinder exhaust valve. (.4) during the missed approach the engine lost power, was maneuvered to land, and came to rest inverted after the nose wheel touched down in soft dirt. The purpose of the flight was to conduct instrument training at local area airports. The flight had departed home base approximately an hour away from the accident airport. No discrepancies were noted with the engine during the flight or the approach to land. As the student reached mda the CFI instructed the student to conduct the missed approach. They climbed straight ahead to 500 feet MSL and initiated a left-hand turn for compliance with the missed approach procedure. The engine began to lose power. The CFI declared an emergency and conducted the emergency checklist. She turned towards the runway and slipped the airplane down land on the runway. Due to the altitude, she knew they would not make the runway, so she attempted to land in a grassy area past the departure end of the runway. Again, the airplane was too high for landing and she had to maneuver to avoid the airport perimete r fence. The CFI turned away from the fence. When she returned the airplane to wings level flight the wheels touched down. The nose wheel dug into the soft dirt and the airplane flipped over. Examination of the engine revealed that the exhaust push rod housing and exhaust push rod were bent. The crankshaft was manually rotated establishing valve training continuity. No further discrepancies were noted with the engine.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) POST ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REVEALED A BENT PUSHROD ON #1 CYLINDER EXHAUST VALVE. (.4) DURING THE MISSED APPROACH THE ENGINE LOST POWER, WAS MANEUVERED TO LAND, AND CAME TO REST INVERTED AFTER THE NOSE WHEEL TOUCHED DOWN IN SOFT DIRT. THE PURPOSE OF THE FLIGHT WAS TO CONDUCT INSTRUMENT TRAINING AT LOCAL AREA AIRPORTS. THE FLIGHT HAD DEPARTED HOME BASE APPROXIMATELY AN HOUR AWAY FROM THE ACCIDENT AIRPORT. NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED WITH THE ENGINE DURING THE FLIGHT OR THE APPROACH TO LAND. AS THE STUDENT REACHED MDA THE CFI INSTRUCTED THE STUDENT TO CONDUCT THE MISSED APPROACH. THEY CLIMBED STRAIGHT AHEAD TO 500 FEET MSL AND INITIATED A LEFT-HAND TURN FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE MISSED APPROACH PROCEDURE. THE ENGINE BEGAN TO LOSE POWER. THE CFI DECLARED AN EMERGENCY AND CONDUCTED THE EMERGENCY CHECKLIST. SHE TURNED TOWARDS THE RUNWAY AND SLIPPED THE AIRPLANE DOWN LAND ON THE RUNWAY. DUE TO THE ALTITUDE, SHE KNEW THEY WOULD NOT MAKE THE RUNWAY, SO SHE ATTEMPTED TO LAND IN A GRASSY AREA PAST THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY. AGAIN, THE AIRPLANE WAS TOO HIGH FOR LANDING AND SHE HAD TO MANEUVER TO AVOID THE AIRPORT PERIMETE R FENCE. THE CFI TURNED AWAY FROM THE FENCE. WHEN SHE RETURNED THE AIRPLANE TO WINGS LEVEL FLIGHT THE WHEELS TOUCHED DOWN. THE NOSE WHEEL DUG INTO THE SOFT DIRT AND THE AIRPLANE FLIPPED OVER. EXAMINATION OF THE ENGINE REVEALED THAT THE EXHAUST PUSH ROD HOUSING AND EXHAUST PUSH ROD WERE BENT. THE CRANKSHAFT WAS MANUALLY ROTATED ESTABLISHING VALVE TRAINING CONTINUITY. NO FURTHER DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED WITH THE ENGINE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.