20020402012629A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 152 · Boulder City, NV · April 2, 2002

Date
April 2, 2002 · 16:55 local
Place
Boulder City, NV
Airport
Boulder City Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N48908
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX02LA123
Reported as
Cessna 152
Reported engine
Lycoming O235L2C
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
713 total126 in this make and model209 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The airplane made an off airport forced landing following a loss of engine power immediately after departure. After takeoff, upon reaching 300 to 400 feet above ground level (AGL), the engine experienced a rapid loss of power. The pilot maneuvered the airplane in a gliding configuration and, after determining that the airplane was unable to reach airport, opted to perform a forced landing in a dry riverbed. While in the landing flare, the airplane collided with vegetation and came to an abrupt stop after impacting a large bush. A review of the airplane's maintenance records disclosed that the engine had a history of ongoing problems with the idle mixture. In an effort to address those problems, the operator had the carburetor overhauled about a week prior to the accident. The mixture discrepancy occurred again following the carburetor overhaul. After the accident, an engine examination revealed that spark plugs from the number one cylinder, as well as the top number two plug, appeared dark and sooty, with the bottom number two plug being oily. In addition, the bottom number three and four plugs were covered in lead deposits. Investigators performed an engine run, whre it accelerated up to 1,600 revolutions per minute (RPM) and, despite black smoke emitting from the exhaust stack, ran smoothly; after leaning out the mixture, it accelerated up to 2,100 RPM and the exhaust cleared. A detailed examination of the carburetor revealed no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies other than an excessively low idle fuel flow.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE AIRPLANE MADE AN OFF AIRPORT FORCED LANDING FOLLOWING A LOSS OF ENGINE POWER IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEPARTURE. AFTER TAKEOFF, UPON REACHING 300 TO 400 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL (AGL), THE ENGINE EXPERIENCED A RAPID LOSS OF POWER. THE PILOT MANEUVERED THE AIRPLANE IN A GLIDING CONFIGURATION AND, AFTER DETERMINING THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS UNABLE TO REACH AIRPORT, OPTED TO PERFORM A FORCED LANDING IN A DRY RIVERBED. WHILE IN THE LANDING FLARE, THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH VEGETATION AND CAME TO AN ABRUPT STOP AFTER IMPACTING A LARGE BUSH. A REVIEW OF THE AIRPLANE'S MAINTENANCE RECORDS DISCLOSED THAT THE ENGINE HAD A HISTORY OF ONGOING PROBLEMS WITH THE IDLE MIXTURE. IN AN EFFORT TO ADDRESS THOSE PROBLEMS, THE OPERATOR HAD THE CARBURETOR OVERHAULED ABOUT A WEEK PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. THE MIXTURE DISCREPANCY OCCURRED AGAIN FOLLOWING THE CARBURETOR OVERHAUL. AFTER THE ACCIDENT, AN ENGINE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT SPARK PLUGS FROM THE NUMBER ONE CYLINDER, AS WELL AS THE TOP NUMBER TWO PLUG, APPEARED DARK AND SOOTY, WITH THE BOTTOM NUMBER TWO PLUG BEING OILY. IN ADDITION, THE BOTTOM NUMBER THREE AND FOUR PLUGS WERE COVERED IN LEAD DEPOSITS. INVESTIGATORS PERFORMED AN ENGINE RUN, WHRE IT ACCELERATED UP TO 1,600 REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE (RPM) AND, DESPITE BLACK SMOKE EMITTING FROM THE EXHAUST STACK, RAN SMOOTHLY; AFTER LEANING OUT THE MIXTURE, IT ACCELERATED UP TO 2,100 RPM AND THE EXHAUST CLEARED. A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE CARBURETOR REVEALED NO MECHANICAL MALFUNCTIONS OR ANOMALIES OTHER THAN AN EXCESSIVELY LOW IDLE FUEL FLOW.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.