What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On may 5, 2003, the above pilot was giving a short dual flight with a rated helicopter pilot (this pilot had no R-22 time). During landing, the CFI stated that the pilot froze up on the controls and that he was unable to regain control of the aircraft before the aircraft entered a dynamic rollover condition. Aircraft sustained damage. During post incident investigation, no defects were noted with regard to the flight control system or powerplant system. Several discussions ensued with the national resource specialist for the Robinson R-22, privacy data omitted soliciting input with regard to corrective action. privacy data omitted Statements from the CFI and pilot indicate that the CFI was on the controls with the pilot at all times, so sfar 73-1 is not an issue. privacy data omitted Went on to further state that a 44709 ride is not indicated for this incident.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON MAY 5, 2003, THE ABOVE PILOT WAS GIVING A SHORT DUAL FLIGHT WITH A RATED HELICOPTER PILOT (THIS PILOT HAD NO R-22 TIME). DURING LANDING, THE CFI STATED THAT THE PILOT FROZE UP ON THE CONTROLS AND THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO REGAIN CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT BEFORE THE AIRCRAFT ENTERED A DYNAMIC ROLLOVER CONDITION. AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED DAMAGE. DURING POST INCIDENT INVESTIGATION, NO DEFECTS WERE NOTED WITH REGARD TO THE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM OR POWERPLANT SYSTEM. SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS ENSUED WITH THE NATIONAL RESOURCE SPECIALIST FOR THE ROBINSON R-22, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ SOLICITING INPUT WITH REGARD TO CORRECTIVE ACTION. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ STATEMENTS FROM THE CFI AND PILOT INDICATE THAT THE CFI WAS ON THE CONTROLS WITH THE PILOT AT ALL TIMES, SO SFAR 73-1 IS NOT AN ISSUE. ^PRIVACY DAT^ WENT ON TO FURTHER STATE THAT A 44709 RIDE IS NOT INDICATED FOR THIS INCIDENT.