What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The pilot stated that he took off runway (1) one, which had an uphill slope, and felt that it took a little longer than normal to get airborne, even though the engine sounded as if it were producing full power. After lift-off, he explained that the aircraft failed to climb as he felt it should and that he had to lower the nose in order to maintain the desired airspeed. Once he lowered the nose, the aircraft was not able to clear the tree line which was about a quarter of a mile from the end of the runway boundary. The pilot also stated that the aircraft impacted the trees while in flight and that it did not stall. He said he made the decision to hit the trees, rather than losing control by raising the nose of the aircraft and stalling.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE PILOT STATED THAT HE TOOK OFF RUNWAY (1) ONE, WHICH HAD AN UPHILL SLOPE, AND FELT THAT IT TOOK A LITTLE LONGER THAN NORMAL TO GET AIRBORNE, EVEN THOUGH THE ENGINE SOUNDED AS IF IT WERE PRODUCING FULL POWER. AFTER LIFT-OFF, HE EXPLAINED THAT THE AIRCRAFT FAILED TO CLIMB AS HE FELT IT SHOULD AND THAT HE HAD TO LOWER THE NOSE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE DESIRED AIRSPEED. ONCE HE LOWERED THE NOSE, THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT ABLE TO CLEAR THE TREE LINE WHICH WAS ABOUT A QUARTER OF A MILE FROM THE END OF THE RUNWAY BOUNDARY. THE PILOT ALSO STATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT IMPACTED THE TREES WHILE IN FLIGHT AND THAT IT DID NOT STALL. HE SAID HE MADE THE DECISION TO HIT THE TREES, RATHER THAN LOSING CONTROL BY RAISING THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT AND STALLING.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N55175 · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.