20030703013119I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · AMD FALCON50MYST · Carlsbad, CA · July 3, 2003

Date: July 3, 2003 · 19:30 local
Place: Carlsbad, CA
Airport: Mcclellan-Palomar
Phase of flight: Roll-Out (Fixed Wing)
Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator: MHAA
Damage: Minor damage
Aircraft: N678MA
Reported as: AMD FALCON50MYST
Fatal injuries: 0
Pilot’s flight hours: 26,200 total2,850 in this make and model164 in the last 90 days

N678MARegistration cancelled Feb 12, 2019 · Dassault-Breguet FALCON 50S/N 116 · Built 1982 Airframe modelDassault-Breguet FALCON 50 Engine modelAiResearch TFE731 seriesTurbo-jet

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Under investigation. (-23 amendment) the aircraft landed fast and hard, using approximately one half of runway 24. The aircraft blew one tire on each main landing gear and failed to stop before skidding off of the runway causing damage. Also suspect aircraft may have been overweight. Investigation by FSDO a/w inspector and the airframe manufacturer could find no discrepancies with the aircraft braking system, although the components are being returned to the manufacturer for further inspection. (-23 2nd amendment) based on reliable evidence obtained from the company chief pilot and pilot-in-command of the subject aircraft, it was determined that the approach and landing were within the manufacturers limits and good operating practices. The aircraft blew one tire on each main landing gear and failed to stop before skidding off of the runway causing damage.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) UNDER INVESTIGATION. (-23 AMENDMENT) THE AIRCRAFT LANDED FAST AND HARD, USING APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF OF RUNWAY 24. THE AIRCRAFT BLEW ONE TIRE ON EACH MAIN LANDING GEAR AND FAILED TO STOP BEFORE SKIDDING OFF OF THE RUNWAY CAUSING DAMAGE. ALSO SUSPECT AIRCRAFT MAY HAVE BEEN OVERWEIGHT. INVESTIGATION BY FSDO A/W INSPECTOR AND THE AIRFRAME MANUFACTURER COULD FIND NO DISCREPANCIES WITH THE AIRCRAFT BRAKING SYSTEM, ALTHOUGH THE COMPONENTS ARE BEING RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR FURTHER INSPECTION. (-23 2ND AMENDMENT) BASED ON RELIABLE EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE COMPANY CHIEF PILOT AND PILOT-IN-COMMAND OF THE SUBJECT AIRCRAFT, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE APPROACH AND LANDING WERE WITHIN THE MANUFACTURERS LIMITS AND GOOD OPERATING PRACTICES. THE AIRCRAFT BLEW ONE TIRE ON EACH MAIN LANDING GEAR AND FAILED TO STOP BEFORE SKIDDING OFF OF THE RUNWAY CAUSING DAMAGE.