20040114011139A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 210L · Ft Meade, FL · January 14, 2004

Date
January 14, 2004 · 06:30 local
Place
Ft Meade, FL
Phase of flight
Takeoff Ground Roll
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N453MC
NTSB investigation
NTSBMIA04CA040
Reported as
Cessna 210L
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,000 total1,700 in this make and model30 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) During the post-accident interview, the pilot stated that while performing his pre-takeoff runup, the existing fog in the area got thicker; the windshield of his airplane also "fogged up." He said he could see stars in the sky looking vertically, but the horizontal distance was only 100 to 200 feet. Contributing to the reduced visibility was darkness--it was still about 30 to 40 minutes to sunrise. The pilot thought that he was centered adequately on the grass runway which is about 150 ft. wide and 4,000 ft. long with no lights or centerline markings. According to the pilot, he applied power for takeoff, began rolling, and after a few seconds he saw he was headed towards the barb wire fence which borders the left side of the runway. He attempted to apply up elevator in an attempt to jump the fence and get the airplane to fly, but just as the airplane became airborne, the left main landing gear and part of the empennage contacted the fence and a supporting post. This action caused the airplane to pivot and to be pulled back to the edge of the runway where it stopped. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the empennage supporting structure and minor damage to the horizontal stabilizers, left wing, landing gear and propeller.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) DURING THE POST-ACCIDENT INTERVIEW, THE PILOT STATED THAT WHILE PERFORMING HIS PRE-TAKEOFF RUNUP, THE EXISTING FOG IN THE AREA GOT THICKER; THE WINDSHIELD OF HIS AIRPLANE ALSO "FOGGED UP." HE SAID HE COULD SEE STARS IN THE SKY LOOKING VERTICALLY, BUT THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE WAS ONLY 100 TO 200 FEET. CONTRIBUTING TO THE REDUCED VISIBILITY WAS DARKNESS--IT WAS STILL ABOUT 30 TO 40 MINUTES TO SUNRISE. THE PILOT THOUGHT THAT HE WAS CENTERED ADEQUATELY ON THE GRASS RUNWAY WHICH IS ABOUT 150 FT. WIDE AND 4,000 FT. LONG WITH NO LIGHTS OR CENTERLINE MARKINGS. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, HE APPLIED POWER FOR TAKEOFF, BEGAN ROLLING, AND AFTER A FEW SECONDS HE SAW HE WAS HEADED TOWARDS THE BARB WIRE FENCE WHICH BORDERS THE LEFT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY UP ELEVATOR IN AN ATTEMPT TO JUMP THE FENCE AND GET THE AIRPLANE TO FLY, BUT JUST AS THE AIRPLANE BECAME AIRBORNE, THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR AND PART OF THE EMPENNAGE CONTACTED THE FENCE AND A SUPPORTING POST. THIS ACTION CAUSED THE AIRPLANE TO PIVOT AND TO BE PULLED BACK TO THE EDGE OF THE RUNWAY WHERE IT STOPPED. THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE EMPENNAGE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE AND MINOR DAMAGE TO THE HORIZONTAL STABILIZERS, LEFT WING, LANDING GEAR AND PROPELLER.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.