What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) privacy data omitted a passenger occupying seat 7C, was injured when severe turbulence was encountered on climb-out from lny. ^priv^ said her seat belt was fastened tightly, but that it did not restrain her during the turbulence event. During the turbulence event, she was lifted out of her seat and her head impacted the overhead compartment. ^priv^ was traveling with her ten month-old child who was on her lap at the time of the event. The child was uninjured. Captain declared a medical emergency and requested priority clearance to hnl. Emergency medical personnel and an ambulance met the flight and ^priv^ was removed on a backboard. Subsequently, maintenance personnel inspected the seats and seat belts at row 7, however no discrepancies were noted. A definitive explanation as to why ^privac^ seat belt opened could not be determined; however, a plausible cause was considered: during the event, the abrupt change in altitude-typical in severe turbulence-resulted in dynamic forces that may have shuffled the child across ^privac^ lap. In this process, the child may have inadvertently brushed against the seat belt release flap and caused the seat belt to open. The possibility also exists that ^privac^ seat belt may have been inadvertently opened in the same manner prior to the event, as the child was noted as being especially active.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ^PRIVACY DAT^ A PASSENGER OCCUPYING SEAT 7C, WAS INJURED WHEN SEVERE TURBULENCE WAS ENCOUNTERED ON CLIMB-OUT FROM LNY. ^PRIV^ SAID HER SEAT BELT WAS FASTENED TIGHTLY, BUT THAT IT DID NOT RESTRAIN HER DURING THE TURBULENCE EVENT. DURING THE TURBULENCE EVENT, SHE WAS LIFTED OUT OF HER SEAT AND HER HEAD IMPACTED THE OVERHEAD COMPARTMENT. ^PRIV^ WAS TRAVELING WITH HER TEN MONTH-OLD CHILD WHO WAS ON HER LAP AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT. THE CHILD WAS UNINJURED. CAPTAIN DECLARED A MEDICAL EMERGENCY AND REQUESTED PRIORITY CLEARANCE TO HNL. EMERGENCY MEDICAL PERSONNEL AND AN AMBULANCE MET THE FLIGHT AND ^PRIV^ WAS REMOVED ON A BACKBOARD. SUBSEQUENTLY, MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL INSPECTED THE SEATS AND SEAT BELTS AT ROW 7, HOWEVER NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED. A DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION AS TO WHY ^PRIVAC^ SEAT BELT OPENED COULD NOT BE DETERMINED; HOWEVER, A PLAUSIBLE CAUSE WAS CONSIDERED: DURING THE EVENT, THE ABRUPT CHANGE IN ALTITUDE-TYPICAL IN SEVERE TURBULENCE-RESULTED IN DYNAMIC FORCES THAT MAY HAVE SHUFFLED THE CHILD ACROSS ^PRIVAC^ LAP. IN THIS PROCESS, THE CHILD MAY HAVE INADVERTENTLY BRUSHED AGAINST THE SEAT BELT RELEASE FLAP AND CAUSED THE SEAT BELT TO OPEN. THE POSSIBILITY ALSO EXISTS THAT ^PRIVAC^ SEAT BELT MAY HAVE BEEN INADVERTENTLY OPENED IN THE SAME MANNER PRIOR TO THE EVENT, AS THE CHILD WAS NOTED AS BEING ESPECIALLY ACTIVE.