What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Pilot stated that he was experiencing roll problems (left wing heavy) and decided to land at Lapeer airport, D95 to investigate. While following a slower aircraft in to land, he stated that the problem was worsening and that he was having trouble keeping the aircraft level. His next memory was being on the ground in the wreckage. Aircraft hit power lines (500 ft from runway) and crashed 200 ft short of runway. Damage to the aileron system was extensive. The control stick/quadrant, most of the cockpit, both canards and both wings were torn from the fuselage. The remaining portion of aileron controls located in the engine compartment, including the autopilot roll servo, were examined and no defect was noted. Unable to determine cause of the aileron control anomaly.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS EXPERIENCING ROLL PROBLEMS (LEFT WING HEAVY) AND DECIDED TO LAND AT LAPEER AIRPORT, D95 TO INVESTIGATE. WHILE FOLLOWING A SLOWER AIRCRAFT IN TO LAND, HE STATED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS WORSENING AND THAT HE WAS HAVING TROUBLE KEEPING THE AIRCRAFT LEVEL. HIS NEXT MEMORY WAS BEING ON THE GROUND IN THE WRECKAGE. AIRCRAFT HIT POWER LINES (500 FT FROM RUNWAY) AND CRASHED 200 FT SHORT OF RUNWAY. DAMAGE TO THE AILERON SYSTEM WAS EXTENSIVE. THE CONTROL STICK/QUADRANT, MOST OF THE COCKPIT, BOTH CANARDS AND BOTH WINGS WERE TORN FROM THE FUSELAGE. THE REMAINING PORTION OF AILERON CONTROLS LOCATED IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT, INCLUDING THE AUTOPILOT ROLL SERVO, WERE EXAMINED AND NO DEFECT WAS NOTED. UNABLE TO DETERMINE CAUSE OF THE AILERON CONTROL ANOMALY.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N5439N · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.