20040723016209I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 172RG · Tulsa, OK · July 23, 2004

Date
July 23, 2004 · 08:30 local
Place
Tulsa, OK
Airport
Richard Lloyd Jones Jr Airport
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
DF2S
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N5243U
Reported as
Cessna 172RG
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,400 total430 in this make and model150 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The CFI and her student were practicing landing at krvs. The CFI stated that there was heavy traffic in the pattern and this caused her to extend her downwind. The CFI elected to defer extending the landing gear when the checklist called for it due to the abnormal pattern. As the aircraft turned base, the CFI took control because the student was too high to make the landing. The CFI expressed that she was very distracted because of the traffic at krvs, the student's performance, and the fact that she thought the engine may be running rough. She stated that as she flared, she heard a pinging sound from the engine (most likely the propeller striking the runway) and thought the engine was about to fail. She closed the throttle and then heard the aircraft underside contact the runway. The aircraft slid to a stop along the centerline. She said that it was then that she realized the gear handle was in the up position. The director of maintenance commented that the gear handle was in the up position when he arrived on scene.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE CFI AND HER STUDENT WERE PRACTICING LANDING AT KRVS. THE CFI STATED THAT THERE WAS HEAVY TRAFFIC IN THE PATTERN AND THIS CAUSED HER TO EXTEND HER DOWNWIND. THE CFI ELECTED TO DEFER EXTENDING THE LANDING GEAR WHEN THE CHECKLIST CALLED FOR IT DUE TO THE ABNORMAL PATTERN. AS THE AIRCRAFT TURNED BASE, THE CFI TOOK CONTROL BECAUSE THE STUDENT WAS TOO HIGH TO MAKE THE LANDING. THE CFI EXPRESSED THAT SHE WAS VERY DISTRACTED BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC AT KRVS, THE STUDENT'S PERFORMANCE, AND THE FACT THAT SHE THOUGHT THE ENGINE MAY BE RUNNING ROUGH. SHE STATED THAT AS SHE FLARED, SHE HEARD A PINGING SOUND FROM THE ENGINE (MOST LIKELY THE PROPELLER STRIKING THE RUNWAY) AND THOUGHT THE ENGINE WAS ABOUT TO FAIL. SHE CLOSED THE THROTTLE AND THEN HEARD THE AIRCRAFT UNDERSIDE CONTACT THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT SLID TO A STOP ALONG THE CENTERLINE. SHE SAID THAT IT WAS THEN THAT SHE REALIZED THE GEAR HANDLE WAS IN THE UP POSITION. THE DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE COMMENTED THAT THE GEAR HANDLE WAS IN THE UP POSITION WHEN HE ARRIVED ON SCENE.

Other reports on N5243U · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.