What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Nose gear would not go down for a landing at bakersfield. The pilot attempted many maneuvers to dislodge the gear before returning to Bishop. Other attempts to get the nose gear to extend failed. The pilot then landed the aircraft with the nose gear retracted and the engine shut down. Post incident investigation disclosed that the turbo access panel was missing screws along the lower edge. This apparently allowed the panel to bulge out during flight. When the gear was selected down the nose gear doors hung up on the edge of the access panel preventing the nose gear from extending.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) NOSE GEAR WOULD NOT GO DOWN FOR A LANDING AT BAKERSFIELD. THE PILOT ATTEMPTED MANY MANEUVERS TO DISLODGE THE GEAR BEFORE RETURNING TO BISHOP. OTHER ATTEMPTS TO GET THE NOSE GEAR TO EXTEND FAILED. THE PILOT THEN LANDED THE AIRCRAFT WITH THE NOSE GEAR RETRACTED AND THE ENGINE SHUT DOWN. POST INCIDENT INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT THE TURBO ACCESS PANEL WAS MISSING SCREWS ALONG THE LOWER EDGE. THIS APPARENTLY ALLOWED THE PANEL TO BULGE OUT DURING FLIGHT. WHEN THE GEAR WAS SELECTED DOWN THE NOSE GEAR DOORS HUNG UP ON THE EDGE OF THE ACCESS PANEL PREVENTING THE NOSE GEAR FROM EXTENDING.