20040820021789A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-28R-180 · London, KY · August 20, 2004

Date
August 20, 2004 · 17:30 local
Place
London, KY
Airport
London-Corbin Airport-Macgee
Phase of flight
Touch And Go Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N2330T
NTSB investigation
NTSBIAD04LA041
Reported as
Piper PA28R180
Reported engine
Lycoming IO360B1E
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
81 total18 in this make and model21 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot/owner noticed damage on top skin of left wing following his local flight doing touch and go landings. He stated that at least one of the landings was harder than normal, but he didn't think that any of the landings should have caused the damage to the wing. It appears that the affected area may have been repaired at an earlier date, though no maintenance records indicate a repair in that area. Some of the crack in the wing rib at the damaged site, does not appear to be fresh. There are several missing rib attachment rivets. Also one of the rib rivets is improperly installed, I.e. hole misdrilled, and improper bucktail.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT/OWNER NOTICED DAMAGE ON TOP SKIN OF LEFT WING FOLLOWING HIS LOCAL FLIGHT DOING TOUCH AND GO LANDINGS. HE STATED THAT AT LEAST ONE OF THE LANDINGS WAS HARDER THAN NORMAL, BUT HE DIDN'T THINK THAT ANY OF THE LANDINGS SHOULD HAVE CAUSED THE DAMAGE TO THE WING. IT APPEARS THAT THE AFFECTED AREA MAY HAVE BEEN REPAIRED AT AN EARLIER DATE, THOUGH NO MAINTENANCE RECORDS INDICATE A REPAIR IN THAT AREA. SOME OF THE CRACK IN THE WING RIB AT THE DAMAGED SITE, DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE FRESH. THERE ARE SEVERAL MISSING RIB ATTACHMENT RIVETS. ALSO ONE OF THE RIB RIVETS IS IMPROPERLY INSTALLED, I.E. HOLE MISDRILLED, AND IMPROPER BUCKTAIL.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.