What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The commercial rated pilot was returning from Nebraska on a pleasure flight with two passengers on board that was being operated under CFR 14 part 91 on an IFR flight plan. Upon gear extension for landing at Wichita Mid-Continent Airport, the nose gear would not extend. A tower fly by revealed and verified that the nose gear looked to be partially stuck and not fully extended. A successful landing was made with the aircraft receiving damage on the nose cone and propellers. There were no injuries and weather was not a factor.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE COMMERCIAL RATED PILOT WAS RETURNING FROM NEBRASKA ON A PLEASURE FLIGHT WITH TWO PASSENGERS ON BOARD THAT WAS BEING OPERATED UNDER CFR 14 PART 91 ON AN IFR FLIGHT PLAN. UPON GEAR EXTENSION FOR LANDING AT WICHITA MID-CONTINENT AIRPORT, THE NOSE GEAR WOULD NOT EXTEND. A TOWER FLY BY REVEALED AND VERIFIED THAT THE NOSE GEAR LOOKED TO BE PARTIALLY STUCK AND NOT FULLY EXTENDED. A SUCCESSFUL LANDING WAS MADE WITH THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVING DAMAGE ON THE NOSE CONE AND PROPELLERS. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND WEATHER WAS NOT A FACTOR.