20050203001489A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Hughes 369HS · Provo, UT · February 3, 2005

Date
February 3, 2005 · 08:00 local
Place
Provo, UT
Phase of flight
Pwr On Vertical Ldng/Rtrcrft
Operating rules
Air taxi and commuter (Part 135)
Operator
W9EA
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N9118F
NTSB investigation
NTSBDEN05LA056
Reported as
Hughes 369HS
People aboard
3
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
8,500 total50 in this make and model50 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot states that during a mission to perform avalanche control in high mountainous terrain, 10,000' to 11,400' at some point he was hovering at about 4' when he detected some unusual vibrations in both pedals. He decided to reposition to a better landing area and while doing so the vibrations worsened and he heard a "clanking sound" followed by a spin to the right, he immediately performed a hovering autorotation. The aircraft settled into the snow upright and with no damage. The pilot and two passengers exited the aircraft and were eventually taken from the site by another helicopter. The pilot inspected the aircraft and determined the tail rotor drive shaft had sheared. The cause of the shear is to be determined after the aircraft is recovered. Because of the altitude and problems finding a helicopter capable of slinging the aircraft out the FSDO has not been able to inspect the aircraft. The plan is that this will happen during the week of feb. 22-26, 2005. After access to the aircraft is possible this report will be amended to reflect an on-site investigation and if new information is obtained that will also be noted. (-23 amendment) while landing at a snow covered lz at approximately 10,300 feet the pilot inadvertently allowed the tailrotor to dig into the snow during the flare to land. The pilot was certain that he did not have a tailrotor strike however, witness, lab and photographic evidence indicates the tailrotor went about 6 inches into the snow at a point consistent with the point of the landing flare. The pilot likely experienced a height depth perception illusion caused by the light and snow conditions which led him to believe he was at a safe height during the landing flare.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT STATES THAT DURING A MISSION TO PERFORM AVALANCHE CONTROL IN HIGH MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN, 10,000' TO 11,400' AT SOME POINT HE WAS HOVERING AT ABOUT 4' WHEN HE DETECTED SOME UNUSUAL VIBRATIONS IN BOTH PEDALS. HE DECIDED TO REPOSITION TO A BETTER LANDING AREA AND WHILE DOING SO THE VIBRATIONS WORSENED AND HE HEARD A "CLANKING SOUND" FOLLOWED BY A SPIN TO THE RIGHT, HE IMMEDIATELY PERFORMED A HOVERING AUTOROTATION. THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED INTO THE SNOW UPRIGHT AND WITH NO DAMAGE. THE PILOT AND TWO PASSENGERS EXITED THE AIRCRAFT AND WERE EVENTUALLY TAKEN FROM THE SITE BY ANOTHER HELICOPTER. THE PILOT INSPECTED THE AIRCRAFT AND DETERMINED THE TAIL ROTOR DRIVE SHAFT HAD SHEARED. THE CAUSE OF THE SHEAR IS TO BE DETERMINED AFTER THE AIRCRAFT IS RECOVERED. BECAUSE OF THE ALTITUDE AND PROBLEMS FINDING A HELICOPTER CAPABLE OF SLINGING THE AIRCRAFT OUT THE FSDO HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO INSPECT THE AIRCRAFT. THE PLAN IS THAT THIS WILL HAPPEN DURING THE WEEK OF FEB. 22-26, 2005. AFTER ACCESS TO THE AIRCRAFT IS POSSIBLE THIS REPORT WILL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT AN ON-SITE INVESTIGATION AND IF NEW INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WILL ALSO BE NOTED. (-23 AMENDMENT) WHILE LANDING AT A SNOW COVERED LZ AT APPROXIMATELY 10,300 FEET THE PILOT INADVERTENTLY ALLOWED THE TAILROTOR TO DIG INTO THE SNOW DURING THE FLARE TO LAND. THE PILOT WAS CERTAIN THAT HE DID NOT HAVE A TAILROTOR STRIKE HOWEVER, WITNESS, LAB AND PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE INDICATES THE TAILROTOR WENT ABOUT 6 INCHES INTO THE SNOW AT A POINT CONSISTENT WITH THE POINT OF THE LANDING FLARE. THE PILOT LIKELY EXPERIENCED A HEIGHT DEPTH PERCEPTION ILLUSION CAUSED BY THE LIGHT AND SNOW CONDITIONS WHICH LED HIM TO BELIEVE HE WAS AT A SAFE HEIGHT DURING THE LANDING FLARE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.