What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Inspector statement: facts: on April 15, 2005, at approximately 9:15 eastern time, inspector privacy data omitted called our office to report a Cessna CE-172-SP, had arrived at eagle aviation, columbia metro airport (cae) located in west columbia, SC, from an airport in Georgia. The aircraft had been operated with a large dent in the left wing. He requested inspector privacy data omitted and myself come to eagle aviation to interview the pilot about the incident. Inspector privacy data omitted and myself interviewed the pilot privacy data omitted at eagle aviation at approximately 9:45 eastern time. The pilot privacy data omitted escorted us to the ramp to view N37CJ, the Cessna 172-SP she had piloted from Georgia with damage to the left wing. The pilot privacy data omitted provided a written statement describing the wing strike. She also stated she had not used good judgment when she operated N37CJ, with the wing damage. There were no injuries from the wing strike or flight to cae. Inspectors conclusion: the pilot privacy data omitted presented herself as an honest, well meaning, low-time pilot. She was very cooperative and appears to have a compliance attitude.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) INSPECTOR STATEMENT: FACTS: ON APRIL 15, 2005, AT APPROXIMATELY 9:15 EASTERN TIME, INSPECTOR ^PRIVACY DATA O^ CALLED OUR OFFICE TO REPORT A CESSNA CE-172-SP, HAD ARRIVED AT EAGLE AVIATION, COLUMBIA METRO AIRPORT (CAE) LOCATED IN WEST COLUMBIA, SC, FROM AN AIRPORT IN GEORGIA. THE AIRCRAFT HAD BEEN OPERATED WITH A LARGE DENT IN THE LEFT WING. HE REQUESTED INSPECTOR ^PRIVACY DA^ AND MYSELF COME TO EAGLE AVIATION TO INTERVIEW THE PILOT ABOUT THE INCIDENT. INSPECTOR ^PRIVACY DA^ AND MYSELF INTERVIEWED THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITT^ AT EAGLE AVIATION AT APPROXIMATELY 9:45 EASTERN TIME. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DA^ ESCORTED US TO THE RAMP TO VIEW N37CJ, THE CESSNA 172-SP SHE HAD PILOTED FROM GEORGIA WITH DAMAGE TO THE LEFT WING. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DA^ PROVIDED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DESCRIBING THE WING STRIKE. SHE ALSO STATED SHE HAD NOT USED GOOD JUDGMENT WHEN SHE OPERATED N37CJ, WITH THE WING DAMAGE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES FROM THE WING STRIKE OR FLIGHT TO CAE. INSPECTORS CONCLUSION: THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DA^ PRESENTED HERSELF AS AN HONEST, WELL MEANING, LOW-TIME PILOT. SHE WAS VERY COOPERATIVE AND APPEARS TO HAVE A COMPLIANCE ATTITUDE.
Other reports on N37CJ · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.