What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Pilot reported that upon landing in Davenport he flared for landing. He stated that he felt as though the nose gear was settling down during rollout further than usual. The propeller struck the runway and the aircraft settled on the nose of the aircraft. The aircraft veered off the runway damaging the cowling, and aileron of the aircraft. The pilot stated that when the gear was retracted at his departure point the landing gear seemed to be more difficult to retract than normal. When the landing gear was extended at Davenport he felt that it was easier than normal. Maintenance personnel found nose gear components damaged though it was not determined which components were the root cause of the malfunction.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PILOT REPORTED THAT UPON LANDING IN DAVENPORT HE FLARED FOR LANDING. HE STATED THAT HE FELT AS THOUGH THE NOSE GEAR WAS SETTLING DOWN DURING ROLLOUT FURTHER THAN USUAL. THE PROPELLER STRUCK THE RUNWAY AND THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED ON THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE AIRCRAFT VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY DAMAGING THE COWLING, AND AILERON OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE PILOT STATED THAT WHEN THE GEAR WAS RETRACTED AT HIS DEPARTURE POINT THE LANDING GEAR SEEMED TO BE MORE DIFFICULT TO RETRACT THAN NORMAL. WHEN THE LANDING GEAR WAS EXTENDED AT DAVENPORT HE FELT THAT IT WAS EASIER THAN NORMAL. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FOUND NOSE GEAR COMPONENTS DAMAGED THOUGH IT WAS NOT DETERMINED WHICH COMPONENTS WERE THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE MALFUNCTION.