20061002020669I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Mooney M20C · Davenport, IA · October 2, 2006

Date
October 2, 2006 · 19:00 local
Place
Davenport, IA
Airport
Davenport Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N78880
Reported as
Mooney M20C
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
5,000 total3,500 in this make and model16 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot reported that upon landing in Davenport he flared for landing. He stated that he felt as though the nose gear was settling down during rollout further than usual. The propeller struck the runway and the aircraft settled on the nose of the aircraft. The aircraft veered off the runway damaging the cowling, and aileron of the aircraft. The pilot stated that when the gear was retracted at his departure point the landing gear seemed to be more difficult to retract than normal. When the landing gear was extended at Davenport he felt that it was easier than normal. Maintenance personnel found nose gear components damaged though it was not determined which components were the root cause of the malfunction.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT REPORTED THAT UPON LANDING IN DAVENPORT HE FLARED FOR LANDING. HE STATED THAT HE FELT AS THOUGH THE NOSE GEAR WAS SETTLING DOWN DURING ROLLOUT FURTHER THAN USUAL. THE PROPELLER STRUCK THE RUNWAY AND THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED ON THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE AIRCRAFT VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY DAMAGING THE COWLING, AND AILERON OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE PILOT STATED THAT WHEN THE GEAR WAS RETRACTED AT HIS DEPARTURE POINT THE LANDING GEAR SEEMED TO BE MORE DIFFICULT TO RETRACT THAN NORMAL. WHEN THE LANDING GEAR WAS EXTENDED AT DAVENPORT HE FELT THAT IT WAS EASIER THAN NORMAL. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FOUND NOSE GEAR COMPONENTS DAMAGED THOUGH IT WAS NOT DETERMINED WHICH COMPONENTS WERE THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE MALFUNCTION.