20070410010949A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 150G · Enterprise, AL · April 10, 2007

Date
April 10, 2007 · 15:45 local
Place
Enterprise, AL
Airport
Enterprise Municipal
Phase of flight
To Init Climb(1st Pwr Reduct)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N6380S
NTSB investigation
NTSBATL07CA072
Reported as
Cessna 150G
Reported engine
Continental O200A
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
18,000 total0 in this make and model16 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The pilot stated that prior to takeoff and during the engine performance check, the left and right magnetos checked out okay, but the engine ran rough. He applied carburetor heat for awhile and the engine smoothed out. He taxied out onto runway 05. During takeoff the engine continued to run rough and the stall warning horn was heard. He stated that he had planned to abort the takeoff but the aircraft started to lift off the runway and he was at a point of no return. As the pilot continued to climb out the engine started losing power and the stall warning horn was getting louder. The pilot immediately pulled the carburetor heat level and the engine RPM dropped. The pilot made a forced landing in a field north of the airport. During landing the nose wheel stuck in the mud and the airplane flipped over and landed inverted. The airplane incurred substantial damage with one student pilot on board and minor injuries to the pilot. The on scene investigation revealed that the airplane's main spar was substantially damaged. The nose landing gear collapsed and the front part of the engine was substantially damaged, the cockpit and fuselage buckled resulting in major damage to the airplane.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE PILOT STATED THAT PRIOR TO TAKEOFF AND DURING THE ENGINE PERFORMANCE CHECK, THE LEFT AND RIGHT MAGNETOS CHECKED OUT OKAY, BUT THE ENGINE RAN ROUGH. HE APPLIED CARBURETOR HEAT FOR AWHILE AND THE ENGINE SMOOTHED OUT. HE TAXIED OUT ONTO RUNWAY 05. DURING TAKEOFF THE ENGINE CONTINUED TO RUN ROUGH AND THE STALL WARNING HORN WAS HEARD. HE STATED THAT HE HAD PLANNED TO ABORT THE TAKEOFF BUT THE AIRCRAFT STARTED TO LIFT OFF THE RUNWAY AND HE WAS AT A POINT OF NO RETURN. AS THE PILOT CONTINUED TO CLIMB OUT THE ENGINE STARTED LOSING POWER AND THE STALL WARNING HORN WAS GETTING LOUDER. THE PILOT IMMEDIATELY PULLED THE CARBURETOR HEAT LEVEL AND THE ENGINE RPM DROPPED. THE PILOT MADE A FORCED LANDING IN A FIELD NORTH OF THE AIRPORT. DURING LANDING THE NOSE WHEEL STUCK IN THE MUD AND THE AIRPLANE FLIPPED OVER AND LANDED INVERTED. THE AIRPLANE INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE WITH ONE STUDENT PILOT ON BOARD AND MINOR INJURIES TO THE PILOT. THE ON SCENE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE AIRPLANE'S MAIN SPAR WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. THE NOSE LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED AND THE FRONT PART OF THE ENGINE WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED, THE COCKPIT AND FUSELAGE BUCKLED RESULTING IN MAJOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRPLANE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.