What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Pilot was practicing take-off and landings during high wind conditions. Per pilot the winds were up and down in velocity. During a touch and go, the wind became stronger and the pilot lost directional control of aircraft which came to rest on its nose. Aircraft was substantially damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. Pilot was not injured.(-23 amendment) during a short local flight, the pilot experienced a gust of wind during his landing. The pilot attempted a go-around but lost directional control of the aircraft and had a hard landing. The aircraft was severely damaged, the pilot and sole occupant was not injured, visual meteorological conditions prevailed.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PILOT WAS PRACTICING TAKE-OFF AND LANDINGS DURING HIGH WIND CONDITIONS. PER PILOT THE WINDS WERE UP AND DOWN IN VELOCITY. DURING A TOUCH AND GO, THE WIND BECAME STRONGER AND THE PILOT LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT WHICH CAME TO REST ON ITS NOSE. AIRCRAFT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED. PILOT WAS NOT INJURED.(-23 AMENDMENT) DURING A SHORT LOCAL FLIGHT, THE PILOT EXPERIENCED A GUST OF WIND DURING HIS LANDING. THE PILOT ATTEMPTED A GO-AROUND BUT LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AND HAD A HARD LANDING. THE AIRCRAFT WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED, THE PILOT AND SOLE OCCUPANT WAS NOT INJURED, VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.