What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) During run-up pilot advanced throttles and heard a noise from the right side of the plane. The pilot said he thought the co-pilot may have moved his seat. With all systems normal the pilot took off. On climb out the pilot reported to ATC that he thought he had hit a bird. Upon reaching destination the pilot inspected the right propeller and found FOD damage to one blade suspecting the FOD to be concrete. The pilot then called kdet with a request to cancel the birdstrike occurrence. The pilot flew the 2nd leg back to kdet with known propeller damage. Right engine propeller picked up by h&s and taken to their pontiac repair facility. The propeller was determined to be beyond economical repair (ber). Pratt & whitney Canada mm 72-00-00 clearly defines under "l" the need for light overhaul and was further substantiated by pratt & whitney representative: privacy data omitted the need for light overhaul of the power section.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) DURING RUN-UP PILOT ADVANCED THROTTLES AND HEARD A NOISE FROM THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PLANE. THE PILOT SAID HE THOUGHT THE CO-PILOT MAY HAVE MOVED HIS SEAT. WITH ALL SYSTEMS NORMAL THE PILOT TOOK OFF. ON CLIMB OUT THE PILOT REPORTED TO ATC THAT HE THOUGHT HE HAD HIT A BIRD. UPON REACHING DESTINATION THE PILOT INSPECTED THE RIGHT PROPELLER AND FOUND FOD DAMAGE TO ONE BLADE SUSPECTING THE FOD TO BE CONCRETE. THE PILOT THEN CALLED KDET WITH A REQUEST TO CANCEL THE BIRDSTRIKE OCCURRENCE. THE PILOT FLEW THE 2ND LEG BACK TO KDET WITH KNOWN PROPELLER DAMAGE. RIGHT ENGINE PROPELLER PICKED UP BY H&S AND TAKEN TO THEIR PONTIAC REPAIR FACILITY. THE PROPELLER WAS DETERMINED TO BE BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR (BER). PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA MM 72-00-00 CLEARLY DEFINES UNDER "L" THE NEED FOR LIGHT OVERHAUL AND WAS FURTHER SUBSTANTIATED BY PRATT & WHITNEY REPRESENTATIVE: ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ THE NEED FOR LIGHT OVERHAUL OF THE POWER SECTION.