What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On July 27, 2007 at approximately 0954 hours, this aircraft tipped over on its nose following heavy braking after landing. This aircraft had landed on runway 21L, had been cleared for a 'stop and go', and had landed farther down the runway than usual. The pilot stated that he was using more than his normal braking to get the aircraft stopped so as to have enough room to take off again. At approximately 20 to 30 miles per hour, excess braking was applied which caused the aircraft to 'nose over'. There were no scrape marks on the damaged cowling indicating forward motion had ceased once the aircraft had came to rest on its nose. Damage was limited to the lower cowling, the propeller, and subsequent required inspection of the engine for sudden stoppage. There were no injuries to the pilot, who was the sole occupant of the aircraft. There was no pre- or post-crash fire.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON JULY 27, 2007 AT APPROXIMATELY 0954 HOURS, THIS AIRCRAFT TIPPED OVER ON ITS NOSE FOLLOWING HEAVY BRAKING AFTER LANDING. THIS AIRCRAFT HAD LANDED ON RUNWAY 21L, HAD BEEN CLEARED FOR A 'STOP AND GO', AND HAD LANDED FARTHER DOWN THE RUNWAY THAN USUAL. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS USING MORE THAN HIS NORMAL BRAKING TO GET THE AIRCRAFT STOPPED SO AS TO HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO TAKE OFF AGAIN. AT APPROXIMATELY 20 TO 30 MILES PER HOUR, EXCESS BRAKING WAS APPLIED WHICH CAUSED THE AIRCRAFT TO 'NOSE OVER'. THERE WERE NO SCRAPE MARKS ON THE DAMAGED COWLING INDICATING FORWARD MOTION HAD CEASED ONCE THE AIRCRAFT HAD CAME TO REST ON ITS NOSE. DAMAGE WAS LIMITED TO THE LOWER COWLING, THE PROPELLER, AND SUBSEQUENT REQUIRED INSPECTION OF THE ENGINE FOR SUDDEN STOPPAGE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES TO THE PILOT, WHO WAS THE SOLE OCCUPANT OF THE AIRCRAFT. THERE WAS NO PRE- OR POST-CRASH FIRE.