20070802020389I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Amrgen AA-1C · San Diego, CA · August 2, 2007

Date
August 2, 2007 · 14:48 local
Place
San Diego, CA
Airport
Brown Field Municipal
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N9923U
Reported as
Amrgen AA1C
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
10 total10 in this make and model6 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The pilot privacy data omitted was making his first solo landing, on his first solo flight. He made a hard landing, resulting in porpoising of the aircraft. On the third hard bounce, the nose wheel collapsed, resulting in damage to the prop. It is this inspector's opinion that this incident is a result of inadequate pre-solo flight instruction, and poor judgement, on the part of the pilot's privacy data omitted flight instructor. The pilot privacy data omitted was not adequately prepared to solo. By his own written statement, and verbal statements made to inspector privacy data omitted he was having difficulties with his landings for the last three training lessons. His training was also very sporadic. He was taking a lesson about once every two or three weeks. It is this inspector's opinion that the pilot privacy data omitted was not trained to "proficiency" as required by FAR 61.87(c),(2), and (n),(1),(ii,iii).

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS MAKING HIS FIRST SOLO LANDING, ON HIS FIRST SOLO FLIGHT. HE MADE A HARD LANDING, RESULTING IN PORPOISING OF THE AIRCRAFT. ON THE THIRD HARD BOUNCE, THE NOSE WHEEL COLLAPSED, RESULTING IN DAMAGE TO THE PROP. IT IS THIS INSPECTOR'S OPINION THAT THIS INCIDENT IS A RESULT OF INADEQUATE PRE-SOLO FLIGHT INSTRUCTION, AND POOR JUDGEMENT, ON THE PART OF THE PILOT'S ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS NOT ADEQUATELY PREPARED TO SOLO. BY HIS OWN WRITTEN STATEMENT, AND VERBAL STATEMENTS MADE TO INSPECTOR ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ HE WAS HAVING DIFFICULTIES WITH HIS LANDINGS FOR THE LAST THREE TRAINING LESSONS. HIS TRAINING WAS ALSO VERY SPORADIC. HE WAS TAKING A LESSON ABOUT ONCE EVERY TWO OR THREE WEEKS. IT IS THIS INSPECTOR'S OPINION THAT THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS NOT TRAINED TO "PROFICIENCY" AS REQUIRED BY FAR 61.87(C),(2), AND (N),(1),(II,III).

Other reports on N9923U · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.