20070930020709I

Incident · No damage

FAA incident report · Stbros SC7SERIES3 · Moab, UT · September 30, 2007

Date
September 30, 2007 · 11:00 local
Place
Moab, UT
Airport
Canyonlands Field
Phase of flight
Parachute Jumping
Operating rules
Parachute jumping (Part 105)
Damage
No damage
Aircraft
N26LH
Reported as
Stbros SC7SERIES3
People aboard
24
Fatal injuries
1

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The jumper was the second jumper in a group of three and the group was the next to last of several previous groups. His two companions lost sight of the victim relatively soon after they exited and did not witness anything abnormal. After the other jumpers landed the victim was unaccounted for. A local search was conducted and in a short time he was located about 1 mile from the airport on a hillside. An ASI inspected the parachutes. All seemed to be packed appropriately and would have operated normally. No determination could be made as to why no attempt to deploy either chute was made. The exit altitude was 17,500'. Other jumpers told law enforcement they all had oxygen and were using it as required. However, the investigating sgt. reported that the system was simply a tank with a splitter valve with tubes running to each jumper. He was unable to inspect the accident aircraft but was shown another aircraft at the event and was told by some jumpers that the systems were all alike. An autopsy was ordered but it may be 10 weeks for the results. This event was not subject to any FSDO or ATC requirements. The jump aircraft were all contacting den center prior to each jump.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE JUMPER WAS THE SECOND JUMPER IN A GROUP OF THREE AND THE GROUP WAS THE NEXT TO LAST OF SEVERAL PREVIOUS GROUPS. HIS TWO COMPANIONS LOST SIGHT OF THE VICTIM RELATIVELY SOON AFTER THEY EXITED AND DID NOT WITNESS ANYTHING ABNORMAL. AFTER THE OTHER JUMPERS LANDED THE VICTIM WAS UNACCOUNTED FOR. A LOCAL SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED AND IN A SHORT TIME HE WAS LOCATED ABOUT 1 MILE FROM THE AIRPORT ON A HILLSIDE. AN ASI INSPECTED THE PARACHUTES. ALL SEEMED TO BE PACKED APPROPRIATELY AND WOULD HAVE OPERATED NORMALLY. NO DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE AS TO WHY NO ATTEMPT TO DEPLOY EITHER CHUTE WAS MADE. THE EXIT ALTITUDE WAS 17,500'. OTHER JUMPERS TOLD LAW ENFORCEMENT THEY ALL HAD OXYGEN AND WERE USING IT AS REQUIRED. HOWEVER, THE INVESTIGATING SGT. REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM WAS SIMPLY A TANK WITH A SPLITTER VALVE WITH TUBES RUNNING TO EACH JUMPER. HE WAS UNABLE TO INSPECT THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT BUT WAS SHOWN ANOTHER AIRCRAFT AT THE EVENT AND WAS TOLD BY SOME JUMPERS THAT THE SYSTEMS WERE ALL ALIKE. AN AUTOPSY WAS ORDERED BUT IT MAY BE 10 WEEKS FOR THE RESULTS. THIS EVENT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FSDO OR ATC REQUIREMENTS. THE JUMP AIRCRAFT WERE ALL CONTACTING DEN CENTER PRIOR TO EACH JUMP.