20080516836479I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Piper PA-32-300 · Osage Beach, MO · May 16, 2008

Date
May 16, 2008 · 19:00 local
Place
Osage Beach, MO
Airport
Grand Glaize- Osage Beach
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N419PH
Reported as
Piper PA32300
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
140 total35 in this make and model4 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The PIC reported that his landing was normal until the nose wheel collapsed during roll-out, causing the propeller to contact the runway. However, according to an airport employee who witnessed the incident, the first landing attempt resulted in a go-around. During the approach, the witness stated that it appeared that the nose gear contacted the runway first. The airplane rose back in the air, and then it appeared that either the airplane stalled or the pilot tried to force it on. In any event, when the airplane contacted the runway again, the nose gear collapsed. Post-incident inspection of the nose gear lower strut assembly fracture showed indications of stress overload, including excessive side-loading. There also appeared to be faint discoloration along the fracture edge, indicating the possiblity of a pre-existing crack. This incident nr privacy data omitted, is closed with this report.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE PIC REPORTED THAT HIS LANDING WAS NORMAL UNTIL THE NOSE WHEEL COLLAPSED DURING ROLL-OUT, CAUSING THE PROPELLER TO CONTACT THE RUNWAY. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO AN AIRPORT EMPLOYEE WHO WITNESSED THE INCIDENT, THE FIRST LANDING ATTEMPT RESULTED IN A GO-AROUND. DURING THE APPROACH, THE WITNESS STATED THAT IT APPEARED THAT THE NOSE GEAR CONTACTED THE RUNWAY FIRST. THE AIRPLANE ROSE BACK IN THE AIR, AND THEN IT APPEARED THAT EITHER THE AIRPLANE STALLED OR THE PILOT TRIED TO FORCE IT ON. IN ANY EVENT, WHEN THE AIRPLANE CONTACTED THE RUNWAY AGAIN, THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED. POST-INCIDENT INSPECTION OF THE NOSE GEAR LOWER STRUT ASSEMBLY FRACTURE SHOWED INDICATIONS OF STRESS OVERLOAD, INCLUDING EXCESSIVE SIDE-LOADING. THERE ALSO APPEARED TO BE FAINT DISCOLORATION ALONG THE FRACTURE EDGE, INDICATING THE POSSIBLITY OF A PRE-EXISTING CRACK. THIS INCIDENT NR ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^, IS CLOSED WITH THIS REPORT.