What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
While on rnav/gps approach to r/w 5 at 5B2, left wing and landing gear contacted trees that were approx. 50-55 feet tall and were approx. 1000-1200 feet short of the r/w. damage to the wing was: winglet leading edge dented 12" apove nav light, wing leading edge dented 1/2 way from root to winglet, stall fence directly below wing bent outward approx. 45 degrees, lower skin behind stall fence dented approx 2 by 6 inches. Left flap badly damaged most of the entire length. Landing light on left main landing gear missing and the frame was bent and twisted, with foliage evident. Subsequent investigation revealed that the airport survey was incorrect by 500 feet. Flight check conducted an evaluation of the approach, and removed the approach from its list of approved IFR approaches until trees were removed and a new survey completed. That was accomplished, flight conducted a subsequent evaluation and the approach was returned to service.
As the FAA filed it
WHILE ON RNAV/GPS APPROACH TO R/W 5 AT 5B2, LEFT WING AND LANDING GEAR CONTACTED TREES THAT WERE APPROX. 50-55 FEET TALL AND WERE APPROX. 1000-1200 FEET SHORT OF THE R/W. DAMAGE TO THE WING WAS: WINGLET LEADING EDGE DENTED 12" APOVE NAV LIGHT, WING LEADING EDGE DENTED 1/2 WAY FROM ROOT TO WINGLET, STALL FENCE DIRECTLY BELOW WING BENT OUTWARD APPROX. 45 DEGREES, LOWER SKIN BEHIND STALL FENCE DENTED APPROX 2 BY 6 INCHES. LEFT FLAP BADLY DAMAGED MOST OF THE ENTIRE LENGTH. LANDING LIGHT ON LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR MISSING AND THE FRAME WAS BENT AND TWISTED, WITH FOLIAGE EVIDENT. SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE AIRPORT SURVEY WAS INCORRECT BY 500 FEET. FLIGHT CHECK CONDUCTED AN EVALUATION OF THE APPROACH, AND REMOVED THE APPROACH FROM ITS LIST OF APPROVED IFR APPROACHES UNTIL TREES WERE REMOVED AND A NEW SURVEY COMPLETED. THAT WAS ACCOMPLISHED, FLIGHT CONDUCTED A SUBSEQUENT EVALUATION AND THE APPROACH WAS RETURNED TO SERVICE.