20080805843109A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Amtr SPORTSTAR · St Charles, MO · August 5, 2008

Date
August 5, 2008 · 15:00 local
Place
St Charles, MO
Airport
St Charles
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N411EV
NTSB investigation
NTSBDFW08LA209
Reported as
Amtr Sportstar
Reported engine
ROTAX ROTAX912ULS
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Student
Pilot’s flight hours
40 total25 in this make and model10 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) privacy data omitted was performing a solo operation in N411EV as a portion of his student pilot training. privacy data omitted Departed runway 9 at st. Charles municipal airport (3SQ) and experienced what he perceived as an inability to control the aircraft in its pitch axis. privacy data omitted Remained in the pattern of the airport and attempted a landing at what he described as a higher than normal airspeed. Upon landing the fixed nose gear collapsed causing the propeller and nose of the aircraft to strike the runway surface. The aircraft departed the runway to the left and came to rest in the grass area between the taxiway and runway. The aircraft propeller, engine, fuselage and nose gear were substantially damaged as a result of the accident. privacy data omitted Said privacy data omitted flight instructor privacy data omitted had asked him on August 6, 2008 if it was possible the elevator trim could have been set to the nose down setting. He stated "I suppose it was possible that I did not set the elevator trim to neutral", then he said " I did not even think about the trim tab". When he examined, all elevator/trim control system for the pitch axis had continuity, correct travels, and pitch trim was set at the farthest nose down position.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS PERFORMING A SOLO OPERATION IN N411EV AS A PORTION OF HIS STUDENT PILOT TRAINING. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ DEPARTED RUNWAY 9 AT ST. CHARLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (3SQ) AND EXPERIENCED WHAT HE PERCEIVED AS AN INABILITY TO CONTROL THE AIRCRAFT IN ITS PITCH AXIS. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ REMAINED IN THE PATTERN OF THE AIRPORT AND ATTEMPTED A LANDING AT WHAT HE DESCRIBED AS A HIGHER THAN NORMAL AIRSPEED. UPON LANDING THE FIXED NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED CAUSING THE PROPELLER AND NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT TO STRIKE THE RUNWAY SURFACE. THE AIRCRAFT DEPARTED THE RUNWAY TO THE LEFT AND CAME TO REST IN THE GRASS AREA BETWEEN THE TAXIWAY AND RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT PROPELLER, ENGINE, FUSELAGE AND NOSE GEAR WERE SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE ACCIDENT. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ SAID ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ HAD ASKED HIM ON AUGUST 6, 2008 IF IT WAS POSSIBLE THE ELEVATOR TRIM COULD HAVE BEEN SET TO THE NOSE DOWN SETTING. HE STATED "I SUPPOSE IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT I DID NOT SET THE ELEVATOR TRIM TO NEUTRAL", THEN HE SAID " I DID NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT THE TRIM TAB". WHEN HE EXAMINED, ALL ELEVATOR/TRIM CONTROL SYSTEM FOR THE PITCH AXIS HAD CONTINUITY, CORRECT TRAVELS, AND PITCH TRIM WAS SET AT THE FARTHEST NOSE DOWN POSITION.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.