What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
23 Nov, 2008 at approxitmatly 1816 EDT, N5712M declared emergency landing at kptk due to nose landing gear was not able to extend in the down and locked position. Pilot confirmed this with a flyby to the tower and tower gave the indication that the nose gear was still in the up position. The aircraft landed at kptk with the nose gear in the up position causing damage to the radome, gear doors, nose pitot tube, and forward fuselage. Secondary damage to both engines were substantial that both engines were running at the time of touchdown causing sudden stoppage and severe prop damage. Upon arrival of initial investigating inspector it was found that no registration and airworthiness certificate were located on the aircraft and that hardware could possibly be missing in the nose gear. Airworthiness inspectors were dispatched the following day confirming that the registration was not in the aircraft, and that the airworthiness certificate was. Also it was found the nose landing gear “follow up” linkage was not attached and that caused the nose gear to jam and not be able to extend. Mxs was completed at the previous station when the aircraft was being painted and that no such maintenance action was annotated.
As the FAA filed it
23 NOV, 2008 AT APPROXITMATLY 1816 EDT, N5712M DECLARED EMERGENCY LANDING AT KPTK DUE TO NOSE LANDING GEAR WAS NOT ABLE TO EXTEND IN THE DOWN AND LOCKED POSITION. PILOT CONFIRMED THIS WITH A FLYBY TO THE TOWER AND TOWER GAVE THE INDICATION THAT THE NOSE GEAR WAS STILL IN THE UP POSITION. THE AIRCRAFT LANDED AT KPTK WITH THE NOSE GEAR IN THE UP POSITION CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE RADOME, GEAR DOORS, NOSE PITOT TUBE, AND FORWARD FUSELAGE. SECONDARY DAMAGE TO BOTH ENGINES WERE SUBSTANTIAL THAT BOTH ENGINES WERE RUNNING AT THE TIME OF TOUCHDOWN CAUSING SUDDEN STOPPAGE AND SEVERE PROP DAMAGE. UPON ARRIVAL OF INITIAL INVESTIGATING INSPECTOR IT WAS FOUND THAT NO REGISTRATION AND AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE WERE LOCATED ON THE AIRCRAFT AND THAT HARDWARE COULD POSSIBLY BE MISSING IN THE NOSE GEAR. AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTORS WERE DISPATCHED THE FOLLOWING DAY CONFIRMING THAT THE REGISTRATION WAS NOT IN THE AIRCRAFT, AND THAT THE AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE WAS. ALSO IT WAS FOUND THE NOSE LANDING GEAR “FOLLOW UP” LINKAGE WAS NOT ATTACHED AND THAT CAUSED THE NOSE GEAR TO JAM AND NOT BE ABLE TO EXTEND. MXS WAS COMPLETED AT THE PREVIOUS STATION WHEN THE AIRCRAFT WAS BEING PAINTED AND THAT NO SUCH MAINTENANCE ACTION WAS ANNOTATED.
Other reports on N5712M · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.