What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) A mechanic had performed maintenance on the tail rotor drive shaft, to be exact, the nr 7 drive shaft and the whole gar-lock seal cover input assembly was removed to facilitate removal of the tail rotor gear box. Since the shaft bushing could not be removed to facilitate the removal of the leaking seal, the mechanic proceeded to re-install the drive shaft, he re-installed the nuts and bolts finger tight, when the new tail rotor gear box was installed, the drive shaft cowling was closed, and nobody noticed the nr 7 drive shaft was loose. A maintenance flight was performed, and no defects were found. The next day, a revenue flight was beginning, during run up, the drive shaft separated and caused substantial damage occured.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) A MECHANIC HAD PERFORMED MAINTENANCE ON THE TAIL ROTOR DRIVE SHAFT, TO BE EXACT, THE NR 7 DRIVE SHAFT AND THE WHOLE GAR-LOCK SEAL COVER INPUT ASSEMBLY WAS REMOVED TO FACILITATE REMOVAL OF THE TAIL ROTOR GEAR BOX. SINCE THE SHAFT BUSHING COULD NOT BE REMOVED TO FACILITATE THE REMOVAL OF THE LEAKING SEAL, THE MECHANIC PROCEEDED TO RE-INSTALL THE DRIVE SHAFT, HE RE-INSTALLED THE NUTS AND BOLTS FINGER TIGHT, WHEN THE NEW TAIL ROTOR GEAR BOX WAS INSTALLED, THE DRIVE SHAFT COWLING WAS CLOSED, AND NOBODY NOTICED THE NR 7 DRIVE SHAFT WAS LOOSE. A MAINTENANCE FLIGHT WAS PERFORMED, AND NO DEFECTS WERE FOUND. THE NEXT DAY, A REVENUE FLIGHT WAS BEGINNING, DURING RUN UP, THE DRIVE SHAFT SEPARATED AND CAUSED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE OCCURED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.