What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On July 3, 2009 at 0540 MDT,N988AE, a Cessna 441, made a gear up landing at alburquerque international Sunport 9ABQ). The air ambulance flight had departed double eagel ii airport (aeg) in Albuquerque at 0320 MDT. After aborting the mission to socorro, NM (onm) due to thunderstorm activity the aircraft was returning to aeg. When the pilot tried to configure the airplane for landing, the landing gear circuit breaker popped when the gear was selected down. The pilot was unable to reset the circuit breaker with the landing gear switch in the down position. After conferring with company maintenance personnel, the emergency landing gear extension procedure was executed and the landing gear still did not extend. When maneuvering the airplane failed to get the landing gear to extend the decision was made to divert the flight to abq and an intentional gear up landing was made. The flight was being conducted under 14 CFR part 91 on an IFR flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time of the accident. There were no injuries to the pilot or to the two medical fight crew aboard the aircraft.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON JULY 3, 2009 AT 0540 MDT,N988AE, A CESSNA 441, MADE A GEAR UP LANDING AT ALBURQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL SUNPORT 9ABQ). THE AIR AMBULANCE FLIGHT HAD DEPARTED DOUBLE EAGEL II AIRPORT (AEG) IN ALBUQUERQUE AT 0320 MDT. AFTER ABORTING THE MISSION TO SOCORRO, NM (ONM) DUE TO THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY THE AIRCRAFT WAS RETURNING TO AEG. WHEN THE PILOT TRIED TO CONFIGURE THE AIRPLANE FOR LANDING, THE LANDING GEAR CIRCUIT BREAKER POPPED WHEN THE GEAR WAS SELECTED DOWN. THE PILOT WAS UNABLE TO RESET THE CIRCUIT BREAKER WITH THE LANDING GEAR SWITCH IN THE DOWN POSITION. AFTER CONFERRING WITH COMPANY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, THE EMERGENCY LANDING GEAR EXTENSION PROCEDURE WAS EXECUTED AND THE LANDING GEAR STILL DID NOT EXTEND. WHEN MANEUVERING THE AIRPLANE FAILED TO GET THE LANDING GEAR TO EXTEND THE DECISION WAS MADE TO DIVERT THE FLIGHT TO ABQ AND AN INTENTIONAL GEAR UP LANDING WAS MADE. THE FLIGHT WAS BEING CONDUCTED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91 ON AN IFR FLIGHT PLAN. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS EXISTED AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. THERE WERE NO INJURIES TO THE PILOT OR TO THE TWO MEDICAL FIGHT CREW ABOARD THE AIRCRAFT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.