20091008019999A

Accident · Minor damage

FAA accident report · Arostr RX 8 · Albuquerque, NM · October 8, 2009

Date
October 8, 2009 · 09:30 local
Place
Albuquerque, NM
Phase of flight
Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N4014J
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN10CA015
Reported as
Arostr RX8
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
57 total46 in this make and model10 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On October 8, 2009 at 0930 MDT, N4014J, an aereostar RX-8 hot air balloon, landed in a parking lot near 10th st and candelaria in Albuquerque, NM. The pilot stated that there was little apparent wind until just after touchdown when a gust of wind blew the balloon into a building, breaking a glass door but causing only minor damage to the balloon. The private pilot, who is the owner of the balloon, and one passenger were uninjured. A second passenger sustained a broken ankle. The flight was being conducted under the rules of 14 CFR part 91 visual flight rules. No VFR flight plan was filed.

As the FAA filed it

ON OCTOBER 8, 2009 AT 0930 MDT, N4014J, AN AEREOSTAR RX-8 HOT AIR BALLOON, LANDED IN A PARKING LOT NEAR 10TH ST AND CANDELARIA IN ALBUQUERQUE, NM. THE PILOT STATED THAT THERE WAS LITTLE APPARENT WIND UNTIL JUST AFTER TOUCHDOWN WHEN A GUST OF WIND BLEW THE BALLOON INTO A BUILDING, BREAKING A GLASS DOOR BUT CAUSING ONLY MINOR DAMAGE TO THE BALLOON. THE PRIVATE PILOT, WHO IS THE OWNER OF THE BALLOON, AND ONE PASSENGER WERE UNINJURED. A SECOND PASSENGER SUSTAINED A BROKEN ANKLE. THE FLIGHT WAS BEING CONDUCTED UNDER THE RULES OF 14 CFR PART 91 VISUAL FLIGHT RULES. NO VFR FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.