What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On April 07, 2010, at 0630 CST, a Cessna 310Q operated as a 14 code of federal regulations part 91, personal flight at Clanton, AL (02A). The pilot stated that during takeoff roll the windshield fogged over with dew, and he lost directional control of the aircraft. The aircraft ran off of the north side of the runway. Upon returning to the runway the front gear collapsed causing the aircraft to skid to a stop. The pilot and the passengers sustained no injuries, and the aircraft incurred minor damaged. The on scene investigation confirmed that the aircraft nose gear collapsed and was torn off of the aircraft. Both engine propellers were damaged; the nose of the aircraft was damaged, but there was no damage to the aircraft bulkhead. The aircraft flight controls continuity check was performed and no discrepancy found. The aircraft electrical system was operational; fuel was present in all tanks, and the main landing gear continuity check was good. There was no visible damage to the aircraft wings and fuselage section.
As the FAA filed it
ON APRIL 07, 2010, AT 0630 CST, A CESSNA 310Q OPERATED AS A 14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 91, PERSONAL FLIGHT AT CLANTON, AL (02A). THE PILOT STATED THAT DURING TAKEOFF ROLL THE WINDSHIELD FOGGED OVER WITH DEW, AND HE LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE AIRCRAFT RAN OFF OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. UPON RETURNING TO THE RUNWAY THE FRONT GEAR COLLAPSED CAUSING THE AIRCRAFT TO SKID TO A STOP. THE PILOT AND THE PASSENGERS SUSTAINED NO INJURIES, AND THE AIRCRAFT INCURRED MINOR DAMAGED. THE ON SCENE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THAT THE AIRCRAFT NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED AND WAS TORN OFF OF THE AIRCRAFT. BOTH ENGINE PROPELLERS WERE DAMAGED; THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT WAS DAMAGED, BUT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT BULKHEAD. THE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT CONTROLS CONTINUITY CHECK WAS PERFORMED AND NO DISCREPANCY FOUND. THE AIRCRAFT ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WAS OPERATIONAL; FUEL WAS PRESENT IN ALL TANKS, AND THE MAIN LANDING GEAR CONTINUITY CHECK WAS GOOD. THERE WAS NO VISIBLE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT WINGS AND FUSELAGE SECTION.
Other reports on N69827 · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.