What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Dr. Krishnan was conducting the eighth touch and go on runway 05. He applied full power for the takeoff off phase and began to lose control of the airplane. He initially thought that "a wind gust" caused him to lose control of the airplane, although the tower was reporting the wind at the timeto be 360 degrees at seven knots. The airplane departed the runway surface and and flipped completely over. On site investigation revealed that flight control continuity was correct. Additionaly, this inspector noted that the flaps were still in the full extended position (flap handle also in the full extended position), after the accident. The aircraft received substantial damage. No injuries to the pilot in command who was the sole occupant of the airplane.
As the FAA filed it
DR. KRISHNAN WAS CONDUCTING THE EIGHTH TOUCH AND GO ON RUNWAY 05. HE APPLIED FULL POWER FOR THE TAKEOFF OFF PHASE AND BEGAN TO LOSE CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE. HE INITIALLY THOUGHT THAT "A WIND GUST" CAUSED HIM TO LOSE CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE, ALTHOUGH THE TOWER WAS REPORTING THE WIND AT THE TIMETO BE 360 DEGREES AT SEVEN KNOTS. THE AIRPLANE DEPARTED THE RUNWAY SURFACE AND AND FLIPPED COMPLETELY OVER.ON SITE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT FLIGHT CONTROL CONTINUITY WAS CORRECT. ADDITIONALY, THIS INSPECTOR NOTED THAT THE FLAPS WERE STILL IN THE FULL EXTENDED POSITION (FLAP HANDLE ALSO IN THE FULL EXTENDED POSITION), AFTER THE ACCIDENT. THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE.NO INJURIES TO THE PILOT IN COMMAND WHO WAS THE SOLE OCCUPANT OF THE AIRPLANE.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.