20110627011119A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Cessna 172S · June 27, 2011

Date
June 27, 2011 · 08:00 local
Phase of flight
Takeoff: Climb Out
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
OW6A
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N674SP
NTSB investigation
NTSBWPR11CA295
Reported as
Cessna 172S
Reported engine
Lycoming I0360 series
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
1,100 total150 in this make and model50 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The aircraft attenpted a takeoff from a dirt strip, when the pilot reported that he could not get out of ground effect and impacted the second dirt berm which removed the nose wheel, and nosed the aircraft over comming to rest on its top. Intervew of the pilot reveled that he used 20 degree of flap for the takeoff, and that according to the POH, deployment of flaps of more than 10 degree is prohibited in this modelof aircraft. The instructor ststed that he was in the left seat acting as pilot in command when the aircraft struck the dirt berm and crashed, he stated that the student was flying from the left seat and landed the aircraft. The instructor then stated that he was in the left seat because he felt that the take off was going to be "tight". But the preformance numbers worked. The preformance numbers were caluclated with 10 deg of flaps not 20 deg.

As the FAA filed it

THE AIRCRAFT ATTENPTED A TAKEOFF FROM A DIRT STRIP, WHEN THE PILOT REPORTED THAT HE COULD NOT GET OUT OF GROUND EFFECT AND IMPACTED THE SECOND DIRT BERM WHICH REMOVED THE NOSE WHEEL, AND NOSED THE AIRCRAFT OVER COMMING TO REST ON ITS TOP.INTERVEW OF THE PILOT REVELED THAT HE USED 20 DEGREE OF FLAP FOR THE TAKEOFF, AND THAT ACCORDING TO THE POH, DEPLOYMENT OF FLAPS OF MORE THAN 10 DEGREE IS PROHIBITED IN THIS MODELOF AIRCRAFT.THE INSTRUCTOR STSTED THAT HE WAS IN THE LEFT SEAT ACTING AS PILOT IN COMMAND WHEN THE AIRCRAFT STRUCK THE DIRT BERM AND CRASHED, HE STATED THAT THE STUDENT WAS FLYING FROM THE LEFT SEAT AND LANDED THE AIRCRAFT.THE INSTRUCTOR THEN STATED THAT HE WAS IN THE LEFT SEAT BECAUSE HE FELT THAT THE TAKE OFF WAS GOING TO BE "TIGHT". BUT THE PREFORMANCE NUMBERS WORKED.THE PREFORMANCE NUMBERS WERE CALUCLATED WITH 10 DEG OF FLAPS NOT 20 DEG.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.